All posts by Laura Lance

Florida Betony: An Enigma Wrapped in a Weed

By Laura Lance

If kudzu had a protégé, her name would be Stachy floridana, or Florida betony. As the name conveys, this spectacularly invasive weed that has spent the past 15 years overtaking our flower gardens, vegetable gardens, compost bin, and entire lawn originally hailed from Florida, where it is native. The first betony arrived to our 3-acre plot around 2008, likely via a purchased shrub, harboring in its pot a piece of the plant’s distinctive white tuber, which is shaped like a rattlesnake rattle, hence another of its common names, rattlesnake weed.

With so many reasons to despise it, how did I come to develop a fondness for the plant?

Just a bit.

That’s all it takes of the root to start a single betony plant, which will quickly multiply into dozens, then scores, and thousands of plants. Weeding is useless to control it and, in my experience, has only served to further propagate it.

My first attempt to eradicate it in 2012 — more like an archaeological dig than a mere weeding — involved methodically digging and combing through my mother’s largest daylily bed, which is about half the size of our house, and painstakingly extracting, rattle-by-rattle, the exquisitely invasive root systems of each plant. I even sifted the soil to make sure I got every trace of the roots, then bagged them up for the trash can. It is not possible to overstate the difficulty of such a task, as those roots and rattles were plunged to depths of 12-inches and more. But it was worth the effort, I thought, to rid the daylily bed, once and for all, of the most prolific weed I’d ever encountered.

Had I been listening more closely, I might have heard the betony laughing at my toil. I might have heard the conspiracies being whispered among the stems scattered about the perimeter of the bed.

According to every site I’ve consulted, Florida betony is propagated only by the root tubers. I beg to differ. As we’ve suspected when weeding, and confirmed from mowing, (which casts the stems across the lawn), the upper parts are perfectly capable of propagating the plant. 

Close-up view of Florida betony patch
Florida betony carpeting my mother’s daylily bed in March 2022, ten years after the big dig. If you look closely, you can see some of the daylilies pushing through. The bed gets a weeding every year but the betony is here to stay.

Once Florida betony has taken up residence, there are basically three ways for dealing with it. The most quoted method, offered up in humor by Amanda McNulty of Clemson Extension, is to move. Another method would be to spend 2-3 years saturating the yard and gardens with an intensive, methodical pesticide campaign with built-in spectre of bringing harm to other plants and organisms. The third method is to learn to live with it. We opted for the latter.

Looking on the sunny side

There are those who intentionally plant Florida betony into their landscape. Both the Florida Native Plant Society and the Florida Wildflower Foundation recommend incorporating betony into what’s known as a “freedom lawn,” roughly defined as a yard that contains a variety of plants other than manicured grass — much like a meadow. The term, “freedom” refers to the ideal of the maintenance-free lawn — no mowing, no fertilizers, no pesticides, no bother.

Florida betony accommodates by dying back in late May and going utterly dormant for the summer, but not before gifting the landscape with the loveliest of swan songs — a profusion of lavender-colored flowers that arrive at the start of April and, for nearly two months, draws butterflies and bees in droves, transforming our back yard into one big pollinator garden.

From the 2022 season. Note to self: Get some better photos of the betony flowers this year.
Grown in sun, (see stem on left) betony grows shorter, small-leafed, and sparser of foliage, with the stems tending toward red . The shade-grown betony (see stem on right) grows taller, has larger leaves and looks happier and healthier.

Here, it bears mention that Florida betony is in the mint family — square stem, opposite leaves, trumpet-shaped flowers. Think: basil, rosemary, bee-balm, peppermint, spearmint, and, one of my favorites, a South Carolina native called horse-mint. All of these plants are favorites to bees.

While the betony flowers are busy with bees during April and May, the scene below ground is equally busy. This is when the plants produce the myriad white tubers that help the plant do what it does best — spread.

Still looking on the sunny side, the entire plant is edible. So if you find yourself in the midst of a famine some spring, head to your nearest Florida betony patch for some forage. But there’s no need to wait for a famine to appreciate the culinary delights of this plant.

StartIng at the root.

According to the website, Eat the Weeds, Florida betony has an upscale relative called Stachy affinis, or Chinese artichoke, whose tubers can command a price of $150 per pound in the restaurant marketplace. These delicacies arrived, first, to fine dinner plates in Crosne, France, then in New York City — all via China, where they are native.

Our yard weeds look remarkably similar and even have a similar common name — wild artichoke — but they lack the pedigree to command New York City prices. It is nonetheless a tasty tuber with a satisfying crunch that is free for the digging. The best time to harvest in our area is March-May when the bright white tubers are at their peak freshness. Once dormancy sets in, the tubers begin to wither, turn brown, and develop an off taste.

Below are some photos of tubers I dug last year, in late March 2022, followed by the progression from garden to table as a stir fry and, next, a tofu curry. Do those tubers look like big fat grubs? Yes they do. I would probably cut them into little “pearls” for company dinner.

The texture of the tubers is like water chestnuts or radishes — a nice complement to stir fry. The flavor is mild and also reminiscent of a radish, minus the heat. They can also be eaten raw. These tubers would be virtue enough for one plant, but the upper part of the betony also has something to contribute to the dinner plate.

The greens

Unlike the distinctive and delightful scents and flavors of so many other mint-family leaves, Florida Betony is almost devoid of scent. Eaten raw, the leaves have a very mild, peppery taste with slight muddy notes to the flavor. I personally like it. But even the earliest spring leaves have a tough texture that’s unpalatable for more than a garnish. So the better choices are to make a tea (which I cannot recommend for culinary pleasure) or to cook the greens. Any dish suitable for cooked spinach would be suitable for substituting with cooked Florida betony. A simple sauté in olive oil and garlic, followed by a light steaming, is a great start. The flavor is very pleasant and makes a nice complement to a breakfast plate.

Poetry, Medicine and Lore

Little, if anything, is known about Stachys floridana’s past, except that the plant was limited to the lower half of Florida until the 1940s, when it was brought northward and westward, taking up fast residence from Texas to the Carolinas.

The plant was only discovered in the first part of the 1800s, during the Seminole wars. We can only imagine, today, what betony knowledge and lore might have been passed along by the Seminoles, had the invading Europeans not devoted their energies to war, conquest and extirpation.

Of the other hundreds of Stachys species, much more is known. This is especially true of another betony familiar to American gardeners, Stachys officinalis, whose importance is attested by a thousand years of history recorded in natural and medicinal texts.

Stachys officinalis, or wood betony, is native to Europe and Asia, where it has been described by numerous cultures over the ages as a both a panacea and a magical herb. The lists of medicinal and healing properties attributed to the plant throughout all these centuries is staggering. Pliny the Elder, in his 1st century text, Historia Naturalis, described betony as being more highly valued than any other healing plant. Details on these histories can be read at the Met Museum’s “Cloister Gardens” blog. and at Mrs. M. Grieve’s “A Modern Herbal.”

Image of a man harvesting betony. From the 15th century text, Herbarium Apuleii.
Image of a man harvesting betony. From the 15th century text, Herbarium Apuleii.

More recently, in 2020, a total of 60 Stachys species, including S. floridana, and 10 subspecies were studied at the University of Athens in Greece for their phytochemical profiles. The findings from this study (see pgs 53-66 of the paper) along with other studies on Stachys spp — at least one of which also included Florida betony — have only echoed the praises of a thousand years.

Whether the studies will ever be designed to examine betony’s equally praised virtue as a protective, magical herb is anyone guess. In Pliny the Elder’s day, betony was planted around homes and churchyards to ward off nightmares, malevolent spirits, and other dangers. It was worn in amulets to confer protection when traveling. Some of these traditions continue today.

An Abundance of Betony

Certainly, there are worse things than having a yard overrun with betony. In another time, we might have felt doubly blessed. In praise of betony, whatever its virtues, I offer a bit of poetry excerpted from the 9th century gardening manuscript, Hortulus, by Walahfrid Strabo:

In the mountains and woods, in the meadows and depths of the valleys
Almost everywhere, far and wide, grows the precious abundance
Of betony. Yet I have it too in my garden, and there
It learns a softer way of life in the tended soil.

And indeed it does.

____________

Opinion: My Maiden Voyage on the City of Aiken Explorer App

UPDATE: November 17th 2022.
The Kershaw St. leak was repaired over the past week (see photo below). The Sumter St. leak has not yet been addressed. Notice was resubmitted to the City this morning through the City of Aiken Explorer app.

Last month, I learned about the City of Aiken Explorer app* which, among other things, provided a vehicle for addressing my concern of the moment: a puddle in the middle of Sumter Street that has been there for eons. App users can not only report issues like city water-leaks, but can optionally include photos, which is exactly what I wanted.

I dislike apps and would prefer sending my missives to humans rather than ether, but I relented and, on October 23rd, (or was it the 24th?) I downloaded the app. The exact date is unknown to me, as I wrongly assumed the app would preserve a history of my report to use as a reference, should I need to follow up with the City.

That’s the thing about ether. It exists in a realm outside our purview.

Given access to a human being, I could have received confirmation that my report was seen by a person; I might have been given a typical timeframe for the City to assess and/or address such issues. Who knows? I might have learned that this wasn’t even a leak but, rather, an exuberant spring that habitually floods across the roadway; I might learn that plans are afoot to use this spring to water a future community garden in the adjacent, now-vacant lot where, not too long ago, (before someone declared it needed demolishing or moving), there stood an architecturally beautiful boarding house inhabited by people who were one degree away from homelessness.

Yes, a community garden would nicely complement the Salvation Army shelter and soup kitchen located across the parkway from the now-vacant lot.

Getting back to the app, I actually had two infrastructure issues to report, both on Aiken’s historic northside: the longstanding Sumter St. leak and a second leak several blocks to the north on Kershaw St, the latter of which smells like raw sewage.

Below are the October photos my friend and I took of the leaks to make my reports on the City of Aiken Explorer app. The larger of the two leaks is on the southbound lane of Sumter St. between Richland and Park Ave. The Kershaw leak, which I only recently discovered, is on the northbound lane leading to the Smith Hazel Recreation Center, seen in the background of the Kershaw photo.

In retrospect, I regret not acting on it sooner. I kept assuming that, surely — what with all the gentrification commencing along the Richland-Park Avenue corridor —a city worker, employee, shareholder or stakeholder would spot the pond and report it.

At any rate, it’s now been 2 weeks since I made my official report on the City of Aiken Explorer app. I continue to check the status whenever I’m in the neighborhood. Last week, I saw a gathering of crows enjoying enjoying a drink of water over at Lake Sumter. This is a positive for the birds, but for the people who live on the northside, it sends a clear message: the City of Aiken does not care about your neighborhood.

Meanwhile over on Kershaw St. the standing water still smells like raw sewage. Maybe it’s the rotting vegetation to blame, or maybe there is a leak in the municipal sewer line. Someone should go over and check it out.

The City of Aiken Explorer app is a great idea, but to honestly serve its purpose, the app needs to — at the very minimum — provide users with confirmation that their reports have been received by a human being. This way, we can know if our missives got lost in space, or if it’s something else to blame when our concerns are ignored.

_______________

*City of Aiken Explorer app available on Google and Apple

Editorial: My Letter to Aiken City Council About Aiken’s Parks and Northside

Printed copies of the letter below — an unabridged version of my statement to Aiken City Council on October 10th — were provided to councilmembers before last night’s meeting.

This letter draws heavily from the earlier editorial, “A Northside Story” plus last week’s newsletter on Aiken’s disappearing neighborhood parks. This isn’t to offer up a recreational replowing of old ground, but to emphasize recurring patterns and themes in City offices that we can expect to see in the future.

____________

Thank you for this opportunity to speak. I would like to address the persistent refusal by City officials, in concert with the Aiken Standard, to hold themselves accountable for the secrecy and the many points of wrongdoing that culminated in Project Pascalis. But I am compelled instead to speak to Aiken’s disappearing neighborhood parks, which I see as coming from a similar place, where the interests of wealth and power take a front seat to the interests of the Aiken citizens you serve.

In August 2022, City Council adopted a “Strategic Plan” for the future of Aiken’s Parks and Recreation which includes divesting in 5 neighborhood parks in lower income communities, most of these being in the bounds of the Schofield Community Association — a historic neighborhood that is part of the original 1835 Dexter-Pascalis plan for the City of Aiken, whose residents are predominantly working class Black people.


Parks at risk of divestment and closure include the Charleston Street Park at Colleton Avenue plus four northside parks: Perry Memorial Park, Gyles Park, Sumter Street Park Courts, and Hammond Williams Park. Here, it bears mention that all of the parks serve the Census Tract 214 Opportunity Zone, where the poverty rate is currently at a staggering 41%.


I would like to pose the question: Whose future is served by this strategic plan?


The City has shown generous determination, will and money when it comes to redeveloping the Richland Avenue portion of the Opportunity Zone. It would be nice to see these same resources put to use fulfilling the stated mission of the Opportunity Zone, which is to promote economic vitality in low income communities. Demolishing houses, crippling infrastructure, and uprooting lower income residents in this areas to replace them with upper income property owners is not revitalization. It’s gentrification.


The City’s decision to divest, rather than invest, in our Northside parks comes despite study after study (1) (2) (3) showing positive correlations between child health and access to neighborhood parks.

A neighborhood park is defined as a park within a quarter to half mile radius to home — about a 5 to 10 minute walk. (4) These parks are not to be confused with our 3 larger community recreation facilities — Odell Weeks, Citizens Park, and Smith Hazel — which are the anchors in our city park system. Neighborhood parks are important, because not all children have the means for long-distance travel to larger facilities.


Children with access to these parks tend to visit the park more often and to have better mental and physical health outcomes.The health of the neighborhood, itself, is also positively affected by parks, as participation in neighborhood parks is associated with a closer-knit community, safer neighborhoods, and reduced crime. (5) (6) These correlations are true for any child and any neighborhood.


Children who lack access to neighborhood parks are at greater risk for childhood obesity, (7) (8) as well as a lifetime of obesity, opening them to comorbidities such as diabetes, heart disease, gall bladder disease, cancer, autoimmune disease, osteoarthritis, and a multitude of other health issues. (9) Obese children are also at greater risk for depression, poor academic performance and behavioral problems. (10)


The repercussions expand on a societal level, where the costs for ill health, unrealized human potential, lost productivity, disability and premature death grow incalculable. Obesity, alone, accounts for billions in health dollars per year. (11) (12)


Here, it bears mention that Aiken’s northside is also a food desert, which means limited access to healthy food, easy access to fast foods and convenience-store snacks, adding to the health burden for the people who live there and also pointing to an area in sore need of honest economic revitalization, something Opportunity Zone funding is intended to address.


So what would compel a city to close and divest of neighborhood parks in an area where the deck is already stacked against the health and the futures of the people who live there?

Perhaps it’s bad advice to blame. Few, if any of the Clemson study respondents lived in this neighborhood. The average income of respondents ($75k and up) stands in great contrast to the median income ($28K) of the people who live in the area targeted for divestment. Also, only 8% of the study respondents were Black. This doesn’t reflect the demographics of the city (which has 33% Black residents) nor this neighborhood, in which 60-70% of the residents are Black. Also, a large majority of the respondents — 68-75% — didn’t even have minor-aged children. Any of these points should have sent the researchers back to the drawing board.


The Clemson study also didn’t weigh the many millions of dollars invested in Aiken’s southside parks over the past 30 years, which dwarf the combined investments for the north, east and west-sides of town. But it did recommend yet more major investments over the next 5-7 years in the southside parks, including demolishing and rebuilding Odell Weeks. Smith Hazel is to get some more bandaids and another facelift.

Clemson researchers deemed these neighborhood parks as being “underutilized,” without providing criteria for that determination. If these parks are indeed under-used, this should serve as a challenge to Parks and Recreation to learn why and to fix it — not as a clarion call to close the parks.


The ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes famously said that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Rather than investing in online surveys and focus groups who don’t live in the neighborhood, why not go and visit these parks after school and on weekends to see how they’re being used? Survey the people who are using them —- as well as the people who don’t — to learn their wishes and needs.


The public’s silence in these conversations should not be taken as complacency or agreement, but as a sign that the City and its hired researchers need to do a better job of making these conversations inclusive to all citizens.

_____________

REFERENCES
(1) “Let’s Go to the Park Today: The Role of Parks in Obesity Prevention and Improving the Public’s Health” https://www.nrpa.org/uploadedFiles/nrpa.org/Publications_and_Research/Research/Papers/ Role-Parks-Obesity- Prevention.pdf

(2) National Recreation and Park Association publication: “Parks and Recreation in Underserved Areas: A Public Health Perspective” https://www.nrpa.org/uploadedFiles/nrpa.org/ Publications_and_Research/Research/Papers/Parks-Rec- Underserved-Areas.pdf

(3) “Parks and Healthy Kids” https://www.nrpa.org/contentassets/ e7416e8568da437085bcecbcdcbd2e3c/parks-healthy- kids.pdf

(4) NRPA Recreation Size and Occupancy Standards https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/css386/ Recreation_Size_and_Occupancy_Standards.pdf

(5) “How Neighborhoods Can Reduce the Risk of Obesity” https://www.rand.org/pubs/ research_briefs/RB9267.html

(6) The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion” https:// http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388234/#B27-ijerph-16-00452

(7) “Low-income communities more likely to face childhood obesity” https://ihpi.umich.edu/news/ low-income-communities- more-likely-face-childhood-obesity

(8) “Childhood obesity and proximity to urban parks and recreational resources: a longitudinal cohort study” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21075670/

(9) “The Comorbidities of Childhood Obesity” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 351672036_The_Comorbidities_of_Childhood_Obesity

(10) Childhood obesity often affects academic performance: now we may know why” https:// news.siu.edu/2019/03/032619- research-studies-impact-of-obesity-on-academics.php

(11) Productivity loss due to overweight and obesity: a systematic review of indirect costs https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC5640019/

(12) Forbes “Obesity Epidemic Accounts For More Than $170 Billion In Surplus Medical Costs Per Year In The United States: Study” https://www.forbes.com/sites/anuradhavaranasi/ 2021/03/31/obesity-epidemic-accounts-for-more-than-170- billion-in-surplus-medical-costs-per- year-in-the-united-states-study/

(13) Spillover Benefits of Park Proximity” https://ced.sog.unc.edu/2021/03/spillover-benefits-of- park-proximity/

Aiken’s Disappearing Parks

An Unexpected Turn of Events

Somewhere between the start of the August 8, 2022 City Council meeting and last night’s City Council Meeting, three things happened:

  1. City Council discussed and voted unanimously on a plan that recommended divestment and closure of 5 neighborhood parks.
  2. The “Aiken’s Disappearing Parks” flyers and newsletter (see screenshots below) were shared in emails and in the neighborhoods targeted for divestment and closure of 5 city parks.
  3. Aiken City Council members unanimously backpedaled on their support for the divestment and closure of these 5 neighborhood parks.

The story on Aiken’s parks — which started last month as a simple look into the $2 fees the City recently started charging children to use Aiken’s recreational facilities — continues to unfold. Which is to say there will be more articles and more editorials on these pages in the coming days and weeks.

A full-size view of the newsletter, with live links to references, can be viewed in the pdf link below. Please note that the contact information for City Council members, (which was listed in the flyers and on pages 1 and 3 of the original newsletter), has been removed for this posting, as there is currently no need to contact City Council regarding divestment and closure of our northside parks.

Editorial: A Northside Story

Some History

In 1993, the City of Aiken spent $75,000 on what was billed as “a major facelift” to the circa 1963 Smith Hazel Recreation Center. The job entailed replacing two aging tennis courts, updating the facade, removing the fencing, painting the interior, upgrading the lighting, and repainting the lines in the parking lot. 

With this work occurring, as it did, in the wake a recent decision by the City to invest $2.3 million to build a second, major recreation facility on the southside, some saw the facelift as more of an appeasement than an effort to address the long-standing need for more recreational opportunities on the northside. Councilwoman Lessie Price spoke for many when she said at the time, “We want to elevate the recreational programs on Aiken’s northside to the level of the southside.”(1)

In 1994-95, the City of Aiken built the $2.3 million baseball and softball field complex (Phase I) at Citizens Park on Aiken’s southside. Five years later, another $7 million was proposed for Citizens Park, plus over $3 million in upgrades for the circa 1975 H. Odell Weeks Activity Center to include a 16-court tennis complex and pro shop, a new gymnasium, and $200k skateboard park.

In 2004, City officials decided it was time to talk about building a recreational facility on Aiken’s northside. The original $4 million slated for park facility got trimmed by $1 million for other projects. It was decided that the old City dump would be a good place this facility. (2) And for the next 10 years, that’s where the plans for a northside park stood.

In 2014, an Aiken Standard headline read: “Progress Made on Northside Recreation Facilities.” (3) The word, “progress,” referred not to forward momentum on physical construction during the prior 10 years, but to a decision by the City to collaborate with Clemson University, which had been tasked with guiding the City’s path that now included  $2.6 million allocated to build a park or open space on the the old City dump plus another $2 million for a possible recreational facility. It is important to note the use of he word “facility” in this headline and in other discussions of a northside park over the years, as this word was to disappear.

Public input and feedback — deemed imperative to Clemson’s ability to guide the City’s path — was solicited and gathered. A year earlier, the Clemson University Department of Landscape Architecture had created a concept presentation titled, “Northside Park.” The illustration below, from this document, gives visual reference to how a park would be built atop a city dump, as well as a description of some of the challenges inherent to such a project. The rest of the document illustrates the verbiage necessary to market such a product.

From the “Northside Park” presentation: “The technical challenges in building on a landfill include providing protection from the hazard of methane explosion, landfill settlement, and leachate management. The design team including landscape architects, environmental engineers and ecologists collaborated to research existing environmental conditions, relevant case studies and technologies for remediating and monitoring the landfill.”

Councilwoman Gail Diggs is to be commended for her departure from other council members in articulating her concerns over the environmental safety of building the park on top of the old City dump, as well as her belief that a northside recreation facility should aspire to match the standards of the Odell Weeks Activity Center. 

Dump, Landfill: Tomato, Tomatoh

For most of the century preceding this decision to turn this property into a park, the City landfill was called the City dump — the place for disposing everything from household garbage to business and industrial waste, broken-down appliances and equipment, furniture and mattresses; building materials, tree stumps, leaf mould, and even dead animals. For most of its history, the dump’s contents burned in open burn piles. As people who lived on the northside could attest, these burn piles permeated the neighborhood air with the stench and smoke of smoldering trash. In 1970, the practice of burning was officially phased out to transition to burying the trash. The term “landfill”was phased in at this time, but the burning continued. In 1986, the City began phasing out the landfill entirely, because there was simply no more space on that property to bury trash. 

At the culmination of the Clemson University 2014 collaboration — with input from the community, local non-profits, educators, and other interested stakeholders taken, collated, and evaluated — Dr. Bob Brookover of Clemson University suggested, in fact, two facilities for the northside: a senior-youth center and a recreation park. The specific recommendations for these facilities are laid out in the table below, which was published in the Aiken Standard. It is important to note that, at this time, the City dump was still in the picture. 

Among the key requests from the northside citizens for a recreation park was a facility accessible by bicycle, walking, or car. This is why the lands on Rutland Drive, across from Aiken High School, were deemed desirable by respondents. 

Anchors and Chains

In 2015, one year after the Clemson collaboration — and eleven years after the original decision to build the northside park on the City landfill — it was announced that the idea of building a park on the landfill had been “quickly squashed” by City Council members due to concerns about building a park on top of a landfill. 

This revision of history could be overlooked, if not for the fact that the ultimate decision on Aiken’s northside recreation facility was to not build one. Somewhere along the way between 2014 and 2015, talk of a northside recreation facility with a gym had been entirely replaced with talk of a walking trail. Or perhaps an open space. Maybe an an amphitheater.

Toward this end, the City purchased a 118-acre tract of land two miles outside of the city limits on Hwy 1 North. Accessibility by pedestrians or bicycle was apparently not a factor. Ground broke in late 2017. Shortly into the 6-month work of razing the trees and grading 40 acres of land to accommodate the walking trail, playground, amphitheater, multi-use field, and “plenty of parking,” it was decided to name it Generations Park. Later, it became the Beverly D. Clyburn Generations Park.

Much of the City’s attention to the park for the next three years would be directed toward the helter-skelter process of annexing the park into the City, then de-annexing the park, the re-annexing it back into the City via a curious thread of land incorporated into the mix.

A minor amount of energy has gone into rebranding this park which, for a relatively small sum of money, managed to put to rest any talk of a recreational facility. Nowadays, City officials refer to it as an “anchor” and “economic driver” to facilitate growth and development — houses, hotels, businesses, chains and such — between the City and the interstate. It was suggested that interstate travelers might even be drawn by the park to detour off the interstate down Hwy 1 and onward to spend some money in Aiken. 

Phase 2 of the Beverly D. Clyburn Generations Park

The plan for second phase development of the park — the funding for which had previously been included in the City’s Capital Projects Sales Tax list — was killed the same month the park opened. The reason given was price. City officials offered that, perhaps in the future, money could be found through a private-public development partnership. 

We can long ponder what the City actually accomplished with this sleight of hand, but one thing we needn’t ponder is whether, at the end of this 30-year deferment, the people of Aiken ever received the long-awaited recreation facility on the northside. 

Ponder, too, the fact that the City’s envisioned path forward looks very similar to the path backward.

Back to the Future

According to the 2022 Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Need Assessment and Strategic Plan that was drawn from yet another Clemson University collaboration — this one taking place in October-November 2021 — the City should look to divest more on the northside and invest more on the southside. The recommendations that followed, while intended to be used only as a guide, give a clear picture on where the priorities lie, going into the future.

For one, it is recommended that the City determine whether there are certain parks and facilities it should “divest” of. Consideration is recommended on the future of these parks: Sumter Street Park, Gyles Park, Charleston Street Park, Perry Park, and the Aiken Co. Farmers Market.

The recommendation for Smith Hazel is another facelift to include new windows, doors and HVAC; a retrofit of existing space to accommodate senior rooms and a fitness area; a new lobby, reception room and bathroom, and a place to store tables and chairs. 

It is recommended that Beverly D. Clyburn Generations Park should “largely remain an open space.”  No mention of a “facility” of any kind. No gymnasiums — not even an outdoor basketball court.

The recommendation for Odell Weeks Activity Center is to demolish the facility and rebuild it to include 4 gymnasiums; a multi-use room to accommodate 500 people; fitness and wellness space to accommodate aerobics, spin, cardio, strength, functional fitness space; an indoor climbing wall, a walking track, areas and rooms suitable for day camp programs; locker rooms, restrooms, concession/vending, and retail space; consolidated offices for most management and program staff; plus add 2 additional basketball courts and 6 additional pickle ball courts. Six of the hard-surface tennis courts at the Weeks Tennis Center are recommended to be converted to clay. 

The recommendations for Citizens Park include 4 to 6 new multi-use rectangular fields, including two with artificial turf, plus stadium seating and a new building to accommodate restroom and office space needs; a rebuilding of the walking track; a new maintenance, equipment and storage shed; new and upgraded lighting and scoreboards, and an irrigation system for one of the baseball fields. 

First the Bad News

Present-era City leadership does not appear to have our backs. 

Now the good news

We can change this trajectory by participating in local government, by learning about local issues, by attending City and County Council meetings, by using our voices, by organizing grassroots, citizen-based efforts to ampify our voices, by supporting potential candidates to replace elected officials who do not have our backs. 

Also, there is actually a large sum of money from the plutonium settlement that has been allocated for economic development on the northside, where the need is ongoing for economic development that actually meets the needs of the people who live there.

There are better things to ponder, beginning with the need for the City to support the northside, just like they do the southside and the westside. This includes supporting efforts to repair and preserve, rather than demolish houses in established, historic neighborhoods that have been, for generations, a vital part of the Aiken community.

A smoldering dump should never be placed next to anyone’s neighborhood, nor should anyone’s children be expected to play in a park built on top of that dump. This is not rocket science.

One of the problems with running a city like a business is that leaders tend to lose touch with the human element of a city; everything begins to be measured by how much profit it can generate. No one ever felt the need to justify the existence a basketball or pickleball court at Odell Weeks by to its ability to generate profit for the City or local businesses. Why is the northside park being viewed in these terms? And why, after 30 years spent talking about building a recreation facility on the northside — and some 4 years after breaking ground — is there still not a single basketball, pickleball, or tennis court at Generations Park?

______________

(1) West, Otto, “Smith Hazel Center Getting Major Facelift.” 5 August, 1993. p. 1B. The Aiken Standard.

(2) Lord, Philip. “Talk Mounts to Convert Landfill into Park.” 6 February 2004. p. 2A. The Aiken Standard.

(2) Schechter, Maayan. “Progress Made on Northside Recreation Facilities.” 14 November 2014. pp 1A+ The Aiken Standard.