On April 7, 1902, the workers at the King Mill in Augusta went on strike demanding a 10% increase in pay. In retaliation, local mill owners closed all of the local mills, which included King Mill plus all the mills in Horse Creek Valley on the other side of the Savannah River — Vaucluse, Graniteville, Warrenville, Bath, Langley, and Clearwater. The closures instantly threw 10,000 people out of work.
Headline from The Boston Globe, March 29, 1902
The King Mill strike was coordinated with a number of strikes at unionized textile mills, both large and small, throughout the northeastern US, all scheduled to begin on April 7th, which had been organized by various labor unions — textile workers, weavers, loomfixers, and mule spinners, and others.
A major victory occurred 10 days before the scheduled strike as the New Bedford, Massachusetts mill strike was called off on March 28th after the mill’s managers yielded and agreed to the 10% pay increase. The hope among all workers was, of course, that other mill owners would follow suit. (1) That didn’t happen.
Locally, it was the mill workers from the Horse Creek Valley mills that helped break the strike.
Headline from the Indianapolis Journal, Indianapolis, Indiana, April 10, 1902
Headline from Waterbury Democrat, Waterbury, Connecticut, May 22, 1902
One thing all millworkers shared in common that spring — union and non-union, north and south, alike — was headlines. For a while, the news of Aiken area mill workers was read in papers all over the country: from the Boston Daily Globe — which ran numerous stories throughout the spring — to the Portland Morning Oregonian, to the Savannah Morning News, to the Omaha Daily Bee, to the BaltimoreSun, to the Butte Inter Mountain, (out of Butte, Montana), to the Blackfoot Bingham News, (out of Blackfoot, Idaho), to the Thomasville Time Enterprise, (out of Thomasville, Georgia), to the Yorkville Enquirer, (out of York, SC). Hundreds of stories about Aiken County’s mill workers in newspapers papers all over the country.
Curiously, I was unable to find any record whatsoever of this story in the Aiken Standard. What role the absence of news coverage on important stories of the day may, or may not, play in the history of a place is good food for thought on this Labor Day.
Hines, Lewis. (1909) [Some of the children in King Cotton Mill. Augusta, Ga. Location: Augusta, Georgia]. https://www.loc.gov/item/2018675043/ No known restrictions on publication)
________________
(1) Sourced from various articles in The Boston Globe, March 29, 1902. Pgs 1 and 4.
One of Aiken’s more vexing modern myths is the idea that, before the advent of high-stakes, public-private economic development partnerships — with the AMDC, the Aiken Corporation, public officials, private industry and investors wheeling and dealing multi-million dollar deals behind closed doors — our downtown was practically a ghost town inhabited by a small scattering of businesses wheezing on life support.
A few recent samples of the myth:
During the 1970s and 1980s Aiken was a quiet, underdeveloped town with very few attractions. The downtown area and City as a whole were growing at a slow pace and without any impressive economic stimulus. There were only a few businesses in downtown and some in the City as a whole. — Aiken Corporation website, August 2022
”I hope some of you remember the 1980s. You could shoot a cannon down Laurens Street, and you wouldn’t hit a car. You didn’t have to worry about parking. There was parking everywhere.” — Councilwoman Kay Brohl, May 9, 2022
The fact of the matter is that, during the 1970s-80s, downtown Aiken was a vibrant place — home to at least 13 clothing stores, 12 restaurants, 5 furniture stores, 5 jewelry stores, 5 shoe stores, 3 hardware stores, 3 dry cleaners, 3 printing shops, 2 pool halls, 2 office supply/book stores, 1 five-and-dime, 1 sporting goods store, 2 movie theaters, 1 bicycle shop, 2 dance studios, 3 record shops, 2 music stores, 2 frame shops/art galleries, 2 arts & crafts supply stores, 2 drug stores, 2 grocery stores, a Greyhound bus station, 1 garden store, 3 florists, numerous antique shops and gift stores, a half-dozen or more service stations, a hotel, an inn, and numerous realtors, attorneys, insurance agencies, banks, barbers, and beauty shops.
The above accounting is prefaced with the words, “at least” because there are no doubt more businesses than one person can recall. As someone who shopped downtown for all of those years, worked downtown for ten of those years, and lived downtown for one of those years, I can attest to a different story than the one being conveyed today by the City and its corporate partners.
These downtown businesses were not figments. They were the bedrock of a thriving downtown throughout the 1970 and 1980s:
Rudnick s Used Furniture
Byrnes/Aiken Furniture Co.
Rhodes Furniture Co.
Maxwell Furniture Co.
The Diana Shop
Julia’s Dress Shop
Lionel Smith Ltd
B.C. Moore and Sons
MiLady’s
Magic Years
Charlotte’s Bridal
Mangels
The Gazebo
Casual Hut
Slotins
Manning Owens
LeGrandes
Cloud 7
The Carousel
Crest Travel
Plum Pudding
Merle Norman
The Gun Rack
Southhampton Saddlery
Quality Records
The Record Shop
Hydrick’s Music
R&M Music
Burns Dance Studio
Crosby School of Dance
Fascopy
Howell Printing
The Letter Shop
Lambert’s Frame Shop
The Artist’s Parlor
Birdsey’s Grocery
Jack’s Paint Shop
Parker’s Body Shop
Flower’s Paint & Body
Aiken Auto Parts
Johnson Auto Parts
Hydrick Appliances
Dyches Building Supply
WAKN radio
Famous Brand Shoes
Coleman Shoes
Leverett Shoes
Philip Shoes
Fox Shoe Repair
Swanner’s Bicycles & Mowers
Marketplace Bicycle Repair
Palmetto Package
CC Johnson Drug Store
Aiken Drug Store
Big Star Grocery Store
Polk-Griffin Appliance
Laurel/Pridgen Hardware
Franzblau’s Hardware
Holley Hardware
Hydrick’s Appliance
Aiken Sporting Goods
City Billiards
Kaney’s Corner Pocket
McCrory’s
Alvanos Grill
Cheng Garden
Pat’s Restaurant
West Side Bowery
Up Your Alley
Surasky’s Deli
Starnes Deli
The Sub Shop
Willcox Inn
Oyster Bay
J&W Cafeteria
The Spiced Apple
Cinema Theater(s)
Mark I Theater(s)
Greyhound Bus Station
Efron Taxi
George Funeral Home
Elliott Office Supply/Bookstore
Aiken Office Supply/Bookstore
Creative Program Planners
Commercial Hotel
Holley House
Hite Florist
Cannon House Florist
Design House
Adavees
LaMartingale Antiques
Cold Creek Garden Center
Osbon Laundry & Cleaners
Warneke Cleaners
Thomas Dry Cleaning
Plaza Carpets
Tidwell Jewelers
A Family Affair
Holmes Jewelers
Friedman Jewelers
Bradberry Jewelers
The Screenprint Factory
All of the above-listed businesses existed in the central downtown area, (highlighted in yellow below),, except for six businesses represented by the blue dots, which were, (working west to east): Cannon House Florist, Design House, The Willcox Inn, The Carousel + Crest Travel Agency, and the C.C. Johnson Drug Store (located at the corner of Fairfield & Park from the 40s-80s). There were, of course, many other thriving downtown businesses outside the yellow-highlighted area.
1970s era map of Aiken downtown area. Click for full-size view.
Yes, times change, people come and go, economies ebb and flow, and businesses open and close, but no one in the 1970s-80s was talking about the demise of Aiken’s downtown. It wasn’t until 1990, shortly after the grand opening of the 500,000 square-foot Aiken Mall, (Aiken’s answer to Regency and Augusta Mall), plus the construction of several strip shopping centers on the southside, that downtown businesses began to suffer in earnest and fall like so many dominoes. The cause and effect was almost immediate.
Those who speak today of shooting a cannon down Laurens Street would do well to revisit the outpouring of citizen complaints made to city council members about the onset of frustrating traffic congestion on the southside — yet another instant consequence of the unplanned, short-sighted brand of development that overtook the southside during those years. Today’s seemingly irredeemable mess of southside traffic is our inheritance from that era.
Back to the Future
If we endeavor to learn from this history, we could begin with a realistic understanding of developers. Developers, just like any salesmen, sell products. The development industry’s products du jour in the 1970s-1980s were shopping malls and strip shopping centers, which were developed in cities and counties across the country with promises of the economic prosperity and jobs that would surely follow. Aiken’s own Weldon Wyatt was one such developer in the 1980s and even built a few strip shopping centers on Aiken’s southside.
Today’s products du jour are parking garages, stadiums, conference centers, mixed-retail apartments and hotels. Unlike the malls of the 1970s-80s, which took a few years to die on the vine, today’s products are all too often not even making it to fruition. A basic internet search for any of these products du jour + the term “development project bankrupt” produces a roster of stalled, delayed, and failed development projects in cities and towns of all sizes across the country — each one a convoluted tale of public-private deals that failed to deliver on their promises, leaving cities on the hook for millions of dollars, their dream projects too often reduced to half-built white elephants.
Anchors and Chains
Plans for Aiken Mall were announced in 1985 with a projected opening date of 1987. The developer said they would open with 5 anchor stores plus 65-70 shops. By 1987, the ground had yet to be broken for the mall. “Nothing good ever comes easy,” the developer explained. “To build a mall takes a lot of planning… a lot of advanced work.” (1)
Behind the scenes, the developer was still scrambling to get even a single anchor store to commit. Over the next year, one anchor store, Sears, was secured, and ground finally broke in June 1988. When the mall opened in October 1989, there were 2 anchor stores and 22 shops. At this point, the developer’s explanation became, “We fast -tracked this mall, you know, built it rather quickly, and our leasing has not caught up with our construction, unfortunately. But that is typical of everywhere we go.”
In the same breath, the developer assured that, when fully occupied, the mall would produce “yearly sales of $80 million” and “create an additional 800 jobs.” (2)
As anyone who worked at the mall could attest, rumors of closings were a constant among both anchors and chains from the early 1990s onward. Keeping the mall viable, or lending appearances to that effect, was a challenge for most of the mall’s history. The mall was foreclosed in 1998, then again in 2013, with the mall owner $28.5 million in debt. (3)
The history today repeats. Since 2016, the mall property redeveloper’s search for chains and anchors has repeatedly turned up empty, save Belk and Books-a-Million, two pre-existing mall tenants who have said all along that they hoped to continue in that location. The redeveloper’s most recent plan calls for a 100-room luxury hotel, 256 apartments, and 146,000 sq.ft of retail. Several projected dates for broken ground and completed projects have come and gone without fanfare.
These products du jour echo into Aiken’s downtown — the 2017 Renaissance plan, the 2019 Weldon Wyatt plan for the old Aiken County Hospital, and the 2021-2022 Project Pascalis — each of which also prominently included plans for a conference center and parking garage.
Are these developers looking to lay ground for the independent, local businesses that comprise most of the downtown tenants today, just as it did in the 1970s-80s? Or are they looking to replace them with high-rent anchors and chains?
Fields of Dreams
According to the sale pitch, a 5-story apartment complex is the vehicle for encouraging more young people to live, work and play downtown. “Live, work, and play” and “shop, work, and play” are a few of the pitches used by developers to promote various renaissance projects across the country. The live-work- play concept is an old idea and a good one — in the right measure. Using the slogan as a sales pitch for shoehorning as many apartments as can be stacked into a city lot is an insult to a town the size and scale of Aiken.
According to the sales pitch, Aiken will be revitalized by demolishing nearly half of Aiken’s historic central block and replacing it with that 5-story apartment complex plus a big chain hotel, conference center and parking garage. We are told that razing historic buildings and raising rents is the way to prosperity. And it will, but only for the select few who enjoy membership in the developer’s club, where a day’s work spent planning the demolition of the downtown might be capped off with an evening of fine-dining on steaks and top shelf whiskey on the taxpayer’s dime.
Those who profit from the business of demolishing and developing property will, of course, find ways to market the demolition of successful businesses, historic buildings, and entire downtown blocks as the road to prosperity and jobs. The bigger the project, the bigger the promises. But, as downtown Aiken proved in the 1970s and 1980s — and has continued to prove over all these years as it’s adapted, grown and prospered with the times — sometimes less is more.
We already have a vibrant, livable city where people enjoy shopping and spending time. We can thank Andrew Dexter and Cyril Pascalis for envisioning such a place and putting a plan to paper in 1834. We can thank every generation since for being good stewards and caretakers of that plan. History has shown that, given the right planning and care, the rest will take care of itself.
_________________
(1) “Mall Builders Send $91,000 Check for Sewer Extension,” Aiken Standard, January 11, 1987, pg 1
(2) “Mall Developer’s Dream Comes True,” Aiken Standard, October 11, 1989, pg 1 and 10A
(3) “Shoppers Respond to Foreclosure on Mall Property,” Aiken Standard, May 19, 2013, pg 3A.
According to a 2016 Post and Courier article tilled, “Secretive South Carolina Earns an F in Transparency,” the citizens of our state face “major hurdles in the pursuit of public information.” (1)
Click to view full-size images
In fact, South Carolina earned an F grade in two of the most recent reports from the State Integrity Investigation for, specifically, “Public Access to Information.” As the 2015 report observed of South Carolina:
The law gives citizens access to information, but legislators not only find ways to work around releasing documents, but also discourage people from requesting them – either by charging exorbitant amounts or threatening to punish people who make “excessive” requests. (2)
If anything has changed since that report, it is not apparent in Aiken, where City officials recently began charging local independent researcher and writer, Don Moniak, exorbitant amounts during the course of his investigation into Project Pascalis. It was the City’s $48/hour charge for “Economic Development Hours” — quite a departure from the customary $16/hourly rate they’d been charging him for FOIA requests — that drove one recent invoice to a total of $480.50 and another to $525.50.
Click to view full-size invoices
Going forward, concerned citizens are encouraged to learn more about FOIA laws and openness in local government offices. Public participation is integral to openness. That old rule about sunshine being the best disinfectant against secrecy, ethics violations and corruption is still true.
Some say the pandemic was to blame for the closed doors and the lack of public scrutiny. Could be. But it was ultimately the absence of sunlight that created fertile ground for Project Pascalis to take root.
It was the absence of a critical media eye that allowed this public-private development scheme to grow into a $100 million boondoggle so riddled with wrongdoing that — once finally brought into the open — it drew an immediate and well-organized citizens’ opposition that culminated in two lawsuits alleging wide-ranging violations of ethics and state law, with the larger of the two naming the City of Aiken, the Mayor, the developers, and over two dozen members of City Council, the Economic Development Commission, and the Design Review Board, among others.
In the absence of media spotlight over the past two years, it was ordinary people, not local media, who ultimately brought this story to the public this spring. It was ordinary people who raised questions of ethics and law. It was independent writers who volunteered their time and skills to research and to independently publish their findings about Project Pascalis, reducing the Aiken Standard’s coverage to irrelevance and mere fodder for criticism.
To be fair, the Aiken Standard has been flailing against its own demise for years, between declining circulation, falling ad sales, worker shortages, and even carrier shortages, which left many daily papers, including ours, frequently undelivered for a string of months last winter. We kept our subscription, but others no doubt didn’t. Those looking for ways to cut corners in this difficult economy likely welcomed the excuse to cancel their subscriptions.
The evidence of the newspapers’ struggles is plain to see. The State newspaper out of Columbia, for instance, has resorted to high pressure sales tactics not unlike those used by car-warranty robocallers. The Aiken Standard in recent months appears to have resorted to using budget ink, or to thinning the ink to the extent it’s all but invisible some days.
So who’s left to afford the price of sunlight these days?
Keeping an eye on government, business and industry takes money. Keeping qualified staff takes money. Keeping the presses running takes money. Producing quality, investigative journalism isn’t cheap, and the cost of ink to uncover corruption in high places can run especially high — all the more when a newspaper’s revenue flow depends on the very wrongdoers in need of scrutiny and investigation.
So how are newspapers to afford sunlight, when it’s a challenge just to keep the lights on in the newsroom?
My 94-year old mother, who’s lived long enough to know a few things, recently told me she started donating to the Post and Courier’s ”Uncovered“ project, which funds investigative journalism. I initially pooh-poohed the idea, arguing, ”Why should we pay newspapers to do what they’re already supposed to be doing?”
“Corruption festers when people aren’t looking, when the spotlight doesn’t shine. Without fair scrutiny, public officials with weak ethical backbones bend the rules. They help themselves to public money. They help their cronies instead of people they represent. Like a virus, corruption mushrooms, and so do the costs to you and other members of the public. Sunlight can disinfect, but South Carolina has lost some light.”
So maybe my mother is right. Even as the local newspaper persists in ignoring or downplaying the groundswell of public opposition to Project Pascalis, the answer is not to turn out the lights, but to make sure they stay on. Those of us who have been working in the vacuum left by an absent media are hoping the Aiken Standard, The Post and Courier, and their parent company, Evening Post Publishing, will give some thought to our local newspaper’s role in Project Pascalis.
A good place to start would be the front page article, “Impact of Pascalis,” in today’s Sunday paper. Somewhere between the hollow efforts to put a positive spin on this project, and the wall of photographs of the buildings slated for the wrecking ball looms the question, ”Whose interests are served by this article?”
According to one attendee, tonight’s City Council meeting was ”a little subdued” and ”cordial enough.” Perhaps it was the lawsuit filed less than a week ago against Aiken City Council members, among others, alleging an abundance of violations of state and local law.
Perhaps it was the presence of 5 or more police cars outside.
Or the presence of 5 or more law enforcement officers inside, who were there to assist citizens through the security protocols implemented by City Council two weeks ago:
But the meeting was said to be a little subdued. And cordial enough.