Category Archives: April 2023

A Shrub Grows In Aiken

And Other Reports of Modular Offices and DOE Advanced Manufacturing Facility, A Case of Lost Equipment at SRS, the $1 easement in the Highway One Corridor, and approval of water and sewer for the Seven-Eleven Store and Gas Station/Truck Stop at I-20’s Exit 22.

by Don Moniak

April 28, 2023
Updated May 11, 2023 (1)

A Shrub Grows in Aiken



Several years ago, the City of Aiken’s Public Works Annex at 655 Kershaw Street, NE, appeared well-kept, the grass mowed, the weeds whacked, the grate in the parking lot covered.

The city obtained the property from South Carolina Gas and Electric (SCEG) in 2006. The 4685 square foot office building, built in 1975, is part of a complex valued by the city at just over $2 million and insured for $2.253 million—-the same insurance value for the vacant Holley House Motel on Bee Lane.

City of Aiken’s Public Works Annex office building fronting Kershaw Street with weedy parking lot, a shrub growing through a damaged grate, and damaged door blinds. (Photo by Don Moniak, April 25, 2023.
The south side of the office building, with an incomplete, fresh mowing; but with weeds and trash by the fence.


At Monday night’s, April 24th City Council meeting, Aiken resident Laverne Justice spoke about property’s current appearance (above), while addressing the Dumpster Depot’s continued presence in the neighborhood:

It is right there by the old SCEG building, which is not kept up. The grass is not cut (at the old SCEG building), there is trash there. That is city property and it’s not being maintained.” (2:54 mark of meeting)

The next day, probably in response to Ms. Justice’s comments, freshly cut grass could be seen; but the property remained in a state of neglect, landscape-wise. The situation is exemplified by a shrub that adorns a damaged grate in the parking lot.

City code states:

It shall be unlawful for any person to maintain or to permit to be maintained any premises owned or occupied by him or under his control, including vacant lots or land, upon which grass, weeds, undergrowth, trash, garbage offal, stagnant water, building materials, glass, wood or other matter deleterious to good health and public sanitation, which is permitted or caused to accumulate in any manner which is or may become a nuisance causing injury to the health or welfare of residents or the public in the vicinity or causing injury to neighboring property..” (Section 22-7(a)).

Although some complaints are deemed “unfounded,” the city’s code enforcement division routinely issues warnings and citations for “care of premises” and “lot clean” violations of the code. The monthly report is longer during the growing season due to overgrown vegetation in a wet, humid climate; but even in winter there are warnings and citations.

Here Comes The Lab

Site prep work for the Advanced Manufacturing facility. Photo by Don Moniak, April 17, 2023.


Meanwhile, on the other side of town the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is clearing land and doing site prep work (above) on its $50 million, 60,000 to 65,000 square foot Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative (AMC) complex at the University of South Carolina at Aiken (USCA)

The U.S. Department of Energy is expanding its presence across the region beyond the fenced and guarded Savannah River Site (SRS), and the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) is at the center of the expansion. In addition to the AMC, the City of Aiken is currently planning to construct a 45,000 square foot “Workforce Development Center” in downtown Aiken that is also envisioned to be a nuclear nonproliferation training center for intelligence agencies.

According to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), which is tasked in its contract with DOE with design assistance and operation of the AMC, the mission of the USCA complex is to  “be an innovation hub for manufacturing, fostering modern industrial practices, advancing new technologies and training the future manufacturing workforce with a focus on chemical and materials manufacturing.” The security needs for this new federal facility have not been disclosed.

The construction of the complex does coincide with plans for Savannah River Site to enter a new manufacturing phase in nuclear weaponry work, this time to produce nuclear explosive parts known as plutonium pits. The pit mission, as it is commonly called, will involve the need for a substantial materials and chemical manufacturing workforce. Of course, plutonium pit work will be conducted at F-Area; well inside the highly restricted SRS complex.

Typical of DOE projects, the AMC facility is well behind schedule. The ceremonial groundbreaking was in April of 2022, six months after an expected start. In an October 12, 2022, email (obtained via FOIA) from SRNL Director Vahid Majidi to USCA Chancellor Daniel Heimmermann, Majidi wrote:

To be frank, I was expecting the bulldozers to be moving dirt around this month. I know the Department had to make a few last minute alterations, but I don’t know what the time line is. I am still very hopeful for an October start but I will verify with Tony.

According to a November 7, 2022 email from Majidi to Heimmermann, funding issues “were resolved and the building will be built as envisioned.”

In late January 2023, DOE’s SRS Director Michael Budney told the SRS Citizen’s Advisory Board (SRS-CAB):

Uh, you know inflation has impacted the cost of the facility to be built as designed so we are still moving forward. Construction should actually begin here within just the next uh three or four weeks uh I think we’ve worked through all the issues and how we’re going to construct that thing and to meet the original objectives.”

In late March, 2023, work began in earnest; and in April two modular office buildings were moved in to accommodate the design and construction team. The buildings are similar to those found across the SRS radiochemical industrial landscape. (photo below)

According to its physical property inventory, SRNL has seven modular office buildings to supplement what City Councilman Ed Woltz described during the latest State of the City address as “remote, aged facilities.” Close to 1,000 SRNL workers and researchers will continue to work in the aged facilities behind the SRS gates and fences, not within “walking distance proximity to cultural amenities, dining, and retail stores” that was one criteria for the downtown SRNL office complex.

Modular office buildings at SRS with a “Rally Point” for Nuclear Incident Alarms. Photo by Don Moniak, May 2022.




A Hazardous Waste Misclassification and $150,000 Property Loss



As reported in “There’s A Joke in There Somewhere,” SRNL is not immune from basic industrial accidents and mistakes. Hundreds of “occurrence reports” from have been filed from 1992-2023; although many of them involve workers identifying common issues such as alarm failures and fire protection devices not functioning during frigid weather events.

The occurrence reporting system functions as an important safety monitoring program more than a chronology of gaffes and miscues. But some of the latter are within the vast database.

One interesting lab-related occurrence in late 2020 involved the loss of a $150,000 Faro-Arm measuring machine (above) that was classified in the occurrence report as an improper waste shipment to the regional Three Rivers Landfill that is within the SRS boundary. The incident was not classified as a loss of government property. The summary of the incident reads:

On December 7, 2020, during inventory of equipment that was relocated from Building 722-A (F/H Area Laboratory) due to a water leak, the FARO-Arm Quantum M/TE equipment, valued at approximately $150,000 was identified as missing.

An investigation discovered the locked cabinet that contained the M/TE equipment was inadvertently transported to the Three Rivers Landfill on December 4…. Three Rivers Landfill was contacted on December 7, and stated that the cabinet and its contents were unrecoverable. Upon further investigation, it was determined that the cabinet contained a laptop with a lithium ion battery and three lithium-ion batteries. Since the Savannah River Site was not preparing to intentionally ship the items offsite, no pre-transportation function was performed to ensure the outer packaging was appropriately marked, resulting in a Department of Transportation (DOT) shipping violation. The Director of Site Services Business placed a hold on waste shipments from Site Services facilities to the landfill.”

An April 14, 2023, email to SRS public affairs officer Amy Boyette inquiring about the incident, and whether the possibility of theft of government property had been investigated, has not been answered.

The $1 Easement and a Property Ownership Rabbit Hole

Back in Aiken, during Monday’s aforementioned City Council meeting, the issue of the city conducting business with the law firm of Smith, Massey, Brodie, Guynn, and Mayes was raised by Aiken resident Luis Rinaldini. At issue was a proposed easement across airport-area city property to property owned by Bear Mountain, LLC (Agent Ray Massey) for “ONE AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1.00).” City Attorney Gary Smith properly recused himself from the matter due to the involvement of his legal firm partner Ray Massey.(1)

Rinaldini commented, in part:

I just can’t help but saying that Mr Smith’s and Mr Smith’s Law Firm has a terrible record of property deals with the City of Aiken. Some of them are highly questionable. I’ve spoken to the city about it numerous times. We still haven’t heard back (to a request) to try to rescind the Mattie Hall property sales. There were other questionable deals on the SRP property, and the questionable deal in the middle of Project Pascalis to sell the L-shaped portion of the Municipal Building and the parking lot across from the hotel to another LLC sponsored by Mr Massey. This is not a good record. I am on the record saying that I don’t think the firm of Smith Massey should be doing anything with the city. It probably should be banned from doing business with the city for 10 years.” (2:35 of meeting)

Mr. Rinaldini stated he was not familiar enough with the easement application to comment further, but warned that if the deal is questionable action will be taken.

Future site of a 7-11 Convenience Store and Truck Stop (blue parcel). The parcel is directly across from Shiloh Church Road and Fulmer Road, where HWY 1 narrows from four lanes to two lanes.


A subsequent agenda item involved another property (above) further north on Columbia Highway (US HWY 1) owned in part by companies associated with Mr. Massey. Mr. Smith did not recuse (2) himself from the Resolution to provide city sewer and water services for a 7-11 convenience store, gas station, and truck stop. The 7-11 complex is envisioned as a 4,650 square foot convenience store with five diesel pump islands and eight standard pump islands.

Investigating the ownership of the property led to a geniune, rhetorical rabbit hole that only confirmed the complexity of these developments; and serves as an instructional example.

The applicant is C4 CStore Holding III, whose agent is the ubiquitious Capital Corporate Service, Inc. The latter’s listed agent is National Data Access Corporation, which in turn has Michelle Pagan of 2 Office Park Court, Suite 103 in Columbia, SC as its agent. Many other similar paths lead to Ms. Pagan, who maintains a rigid level of confidentiality for her customers.

Although the application lists only Caradase LLC (Agent Catherine Nanarjo) as the property owner, there are four owners of this property listed in the County land database:

AOD Aiken (Agent Ray Massey), Michael McNeil, and Z&B Enterprise (Agent Royal Robbins) are all listed in the County record at 830 Colony Parkway, the business place of Coward McNeil Appraisal.  

Cardasa LLC (Agent Catherine Naranjo) is listed at 237 Park Avenue, SW, Suite 215 in the Secretary of State’s database, but at 831 Hayne Avenue in the County land record. The latter address is owned by G-Mar-C Enterprises, LLC of 1008 Old Graniteville Highway, Aiken SC (Agent George Crawford), whose information in the Secretary of State’s office is up to date. The latter address is owned in trust to two other parties.

AOD Aiken (Agent Ray Massey) is listed at 210 Colony Parkway, the business place of Smith Massey Brodie Guynn and Mayes, in the Secretary of State’s business entities database, but at 830 Colony Parkway in the County land record. 

Z&B Enterprises (Agent Royal Robbins) is listed at 239 Midland Drive, Graniteville, an area zoned RC in Midland Valley Golf Club subdivision,  in the Secretary of State database; but at 830 Colony Parkway in the County land record. The Midland Drive property was sold by Frances Michaelis to Krisha Wall in September of 2021. 

Since 2019, the property has had three changes in ownership:

In March, 2019 AOD Aiken LLC and Cardasa LLC purchased the property, composed of two parcels, for $329,000. 

On March 22, 2023, AOD LLC sold a one-quarter interest in the the property to Z and B enterprises, LLC for $5. The conveyance was sigend by Robin Robbins on behalf of both AOD LLC and Z and B enterprises. (below). Ray Massey signed the affidavit as closing attorney. (The county records list Michael McNeil as the seller, but the RMC deed record does not).

On March 22, 2023, AOD LLC sold another one-quarter interest in the property to Michael S McNeil for $5. The conveyance was signed by Mr. McNeil under AOD LLC. Again, Ray Massey was the closing attorney.

AOD LLC and Caradasa LLC appear to have retained a collective 1/2 interest.

The only other interesting aspect of the equation is that in December 2020, Aiken County Council held the “Third Reading of an Ordinance Approving The Request Of The City Of Aiken To Expand Its Service Area Or District For Water And Sanitary Sewer Services To Include Certain Unincorporated Areas Located Generally North Of Interstate 20 Along U.S. Highway 1 And S.C. Highway 19; Between Wire Road (S-49) And Interstate 20; And West Of S.C. Highway 19 Near Interstate 20 As Are More Specifically Shown On The Attached Map.”

In a letter to County Administrator Clay Killian, City Manager Stuart Bedenbaugh wrote, in part:

We have received multiple inquiries from various entities over the last 18 months about water and sewer service availability for possible residential and commercial development in this proposed new area.”

The map shows a substantial expansion of the boundaries of the city’s water district, extending north of Exits 22 and 19 (below), which County Council approved by a unanimous vote after making amendments to protect existing, closer volunteer fire districts.

From Aiken County Council Agenda Packet, December 8, 2020. The map shows the water district extending only to Exit 22 on I-20, but its precision has not been verified.

In September 2021, The City of Aiken put out a request for bids on a Highway One Utility Extension of 922 feet:

“Specifications include, but are not limited to: Furnish all materials and equipment and perform all labor necessary for the installation of approx. 150 LF of 12″ PVC Sewer Main and approximately 922 LF of 12″ DIP Water Main and all appurtenances for a complete project per plans and specifications.”

On April 1, 2022, a City of Aiken water and sewer extension job was awarded for the revised price of $2,036,543.00 to Corley Construction of Columbia.

The completion date of the job is unknown, but the City’s GIS mapping system shows a map, updated November 2022, of the city’s water and sewer system with both water and sewer extending slightly past Exit 22 on Interstate 20 leading to Columbia Highway. According to the County database, the distance from the nearest property south of Exit 22 (Waffle House) is 921 feet.

City of Aiken GIS showing a slight extension of water and sewer system past Exit 22 on HWY 1.

Updates:

(1) The original story should have read that City Attorney Gary Smith also recused himself from a Resolution to provide city water and sewer services for a 410,000 square foot warehouse on the same property to be accessed via the easement. The meeting minutes accurately reflect this:

“UTILITY REQUEST – RESOLUTION 04242023 Water and Sewer Service. Herb Witter Columbia Highway N Windham Boulevard TPN 133-00-19-011
Mr. Gary Smith, City Attorney, recused himself from this item as his law partner, Ray Massey, is an investor in the company. He left the Council Chambers”

(2) The original story incorrectly reported that City Attorney Gary Smith recused himself from the Resolution to provide city water and sewer services to the 7-11 gas station and convenience store. He did not recuse from that proceeding, as the minutes reflect:

“UTILITY REQUEST – RESOLUTION 04242023A Water and Sewer Service
Columbia Highway N
I-20
C4 CStore Holdings III, LLC TPN 133-00-04-003
Mayor Osbon stated a resolution had been prepared for Council’s consideration to provide water and sanitary sewer service to 5.70 acres located on Columbia Highway N. near I-20.

Mayor Osbon read the title of the resolution.”





(









“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus“

Following the Developer’s Dog and Pony Slide Show and Strong Opposition, the First Parker’s Kitchen Public Hearing Was Continued Until a Later Date.

by Don Moniak
April 25, 2023

Last night, after a three month delay to await a traffic study, Aiken City Council finally conducted the first Public Hearing (Reading) for the proposed Parker’s Kitchen convenience store and fuel station. The meeting ended with Council unanimously voting to continue the meeting to another time pending more information from staff and legal counsel, a better understanding of traffic issues, and examination of a needed deceleration lane on Whiskey Road leading into Stratford Drive.

Council may have also been convinced that any approval at this time might actually cross the high bar of “arbitrary and capricious” and “not a reasonable debate” generally required to overturn any planning and zoning decision in the courts. Every citizen who spoke at the podium expressed strong opposition to this project, even while acknowledging the other two Parker Kitchen projects in Aiken were in suitable locations—the blighted former Dick Smith dealership and the greenfield East Pine Log Road location. “This is not the right place” was a prevailing theme.

The Dog and Pony Show

The hearing began with what can only be described as a dog and pony show. Parker’s Kitchen Daniel Ben-Ysrael presented a ten minute slide introduction and slide show from the 28 minute mark to the 38 minute mark. The presentation included slides of clean stores, happy customers, and top-of-the-mind images such as an impressive old growth veteran oak and a Cedar Waxwing.

That was followed by another ten minutes of question and answer from Council to Ben-Ysreal and colleague Cody Rogers that included a few testimonials from Council members on the quality of the company — which has not been in dispute. Both representatives explained how the development would provide three new entrances to the neighborhoods, but were forced to acknowledge the two new entrances involved hazardous left turns; and the intersection of Powderhouse, Stratford, and Whiskey Roads would still have the only traffic signal.

The reason for the presentation was obvious—controversy. As neighbor Peter Stein—-who was frequently interrupted in defiance of city meeting protocol—put it, even the first neighbor’s meeting “was not positive at all,” and that was followed by a contentious Planning Commission meeting that featured ~15 opposing speakers and zero supporters.

According to City Council’s meticulous meeting minutes, Parker’s Kitchen did not find it necessary to put forth their presentation at any of the previous four Council meetings for the other two Aiken locations; not on April 25 or May 9, 2022; February 27 or March 13, 2023. Both plans sailed through the process with unanimous approval and no negative comments. The presentation was also absent at the January 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting.

A slide from the Parker Kitchen’s Presentation to Aiken City Council on April 24, 2023
Another top-of-the-mind slide designed to instill a positive image. The location of the tree was not identified.


The Citizen Comment Period: Public Safety, Cumulative Effects, Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, and past ordinances

After twenty minutes of time devoted to the developer, citizens were finally called to the podium. In all, eleven Aiken residents spoke against the plan, and no supporters appeared at the podium. Neighbor Bill Reichart started off the conversation by first describing two recent horrific accidents at the Powderhouse and Whiskey Road intersection that disrupted traffic; before stressing the cumulative impacts of over-development along the Whiskey Road corridor, with each sentence preceded by “add:”

Add 350 newly approved multi-housing units…apartments 1/4 of a mile away…the Aiken Mall (redevelopment)…the new Powderhouse subdivision…Lulu’s…Lowe’s Foods…Circle K…and now a new gas station.”

Following more comments on safety by neighbor Carol Martin and Jacob Goss-Ellis’ comment that any such development at Gem Lakes and Woodside would be immediately vetoed, neighbor Anthony Agresta presented a legal concept that City Attorney Gary Smith chose not to challenge. After reiterating that the “other two locations are a good fit,” he described why “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus”—or “deceitful in one” claim, “deceitful in all” claims—applied to this case:

During the January 10th Planning Commission meeting, Cody Rogers stated there would be two fuel tanker trucks a week. Later in the meeting Mr. Ben-Ysrael said they expect 240,000 gallons/week. Do that math, that is is 28.4 deliveries per month, not two per week. There is a legal concept called falsus in uno, falsus in animus, that I am sure Mr. Smith will agree to, that states false in one, false in all. Either the error was intentional or a mistake does not matter. We did not have access to accurate information. When one item is false, there is an obligation to reevaluate everything, and Council should remand this back to planning.” (1:13 of meeting).

There were no interruptions and questions.

Neighbor Jean Greenwald, who unsuccessfully appealed Council’s approval of the LuLu’s car wash development in 2020, was not deterred by that decision that did not find Council acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner. Greenwald, who lives ~300 feet from the proposed gas pumps, stated:

There were certain conditions that were in effect when LuLu’s was approved that were removed.”

She then listed the major concerns of public safety, health, and traffic before stating, “Do your job and protect this community.”

Kelly Cornelius, who has prepared a video to document her points on discrepancies in the LuLu’s and Parker’s Kitchen zoning process, expounded for the alloted five minutes on how past approval conditions that deny car washes, 24-hour stores, and gas stations are still in effect.

The parcel got rezoned from Limited Professional to Planned Commercial in 2003…the conditions are still on this parcel in question, according to a July 9, 2014 memo from planning director Ed Evans.”

Council appeared unaware of the 2003 ordinance defining limits on the Planned Commercial property. Cornelius’ documentation was cited in Council’s decision deferring a vote on the matter and continuing the process until more information was forthcoming.

It did not end there. Aiken Citizen Luis Rinaldini described how overdeveloped for “development’s sake” Whiskey Road is, how out-of-town developers profit while Aiken residents pay, and asked Council to “keep in mind and look after the people who already here.”

A crowded Aiken City Council chambers, April 24, 2023 (Photo by Jacob Goss-Ellis).


Bad Math

In addition to the conflicting math provided by the developer, Mayor Osbon added a puzzling calculation.

During the frequent interruptions of Mr. Stein early in the comment period, the issue of distance from the intersection to the gas station entrance arose. After Stein stated 420 feet was not much distance, Mayor Osbon described bumper to bumper traffic as a reasonable, safe situation:

420 feet is not close (to the intersection. If you use 10 feet per car, you’d have 42 cars that could fit.

In reality, the average car length is now about 14.7 feet, meaning that bumper to bumper traffic would involve fewer than 30 cars. If each car had one car length of space, which is less than the two-second rule, a safer, though not safe, number of cars would be closer to about 14 cars.

These estimates exclude passenger trucks (average of 17.5 feet), the daily flow of delivery trucks, and 3-5 fuel tankers per week, which might bring the safe amount of vehicles on a 420 foot stretch of road to fewer than ten.

After the debate and constant interruptions and arguments by Council, Stein ended with the statement, “We should rename Powderhouse Road Powerkeg Road.”

Mayor Osbon responded, “Very clever Peter, Very clever.” (1:06) Whether the statement can be perceived as complimentary, sardonic, or a mix of the two, is up to the viewer.






From Fuel Tanker Fires to an Overdue Report

The Risk of Fuel Tanker Fires, A Water Guzzling Plant, Another Denial of Public Comment and Inquiry, and the Overdue SRNL feasability study.

by Don Moniak
April 24, 2023

Parker’s Kitchen Convenience Store and Gas Station at Stratford and Whiskey Road

The most contentious issue on Monday night’s City Council meeting will likely be the first reading of Savannah-based Parker’s Kitchen plan for a its third convenience and fuel store, this one at the corner of Whiskey Road and Stratford Drive. The proposal and developer’s application was first reported in Introducing Parker’s Kitchen. Since that report, the City of Aiken planning department has refused to release developers’ applications when Public Hearings are announced.

A few key issues that have emerged since the application was submitted include the facts that:

1. The developer met with City staff from the planning, economic development, and engineering departments two months before submitting their application. Engineering department requests made in the memo were either not completed in the initial application, or not made public; i.e. the requirement that a stormwater checklist be submitted in the initial submission. This document, obtained via a FOIA request, was either not provided to the Planning Commission nor City Council, or withheld from public disclosure.

2. Neither the engineering nor Department of Public Safety reviewed the actual application, contrary to Planning Director Marya Moultrie’s claims that reviews are a routine procedure that precludes public release of applications when public hearings are announced (1)

On January 10th the Planning Commission (PC) heard the case in a public hearing, but first met in work session to discuss the application; which is arguably an Open Meetings violation. According to the meeting minutes, the PC “clarified that it is not appropriate for members of the public to make statements or ask questions, although the Commission is able to ask questions of applicants who are present.” In this system, citizens are spectators, and developers are participants.

At the PC hearing, about fifteen neighbors from the subdivisions accessible only via Stratford Drive spoke either in opposition to the plan or questioned the plan. There was no support for the plan, but the PC recommended it to City Council by a 5-2 vote.

Among the concerns raised that day and likely to be raised again, some by Savannah River Site (SRS) employees who are constantly focused on safety and the possiblity of accidents, were:

a. The Stratford Drive entrance, the only one that accesses a traffic signal on a notoriously busy road, could be blocked by any accident, which would negatively impact emergency response time. One of those possible accident scenarios is a tanker fire, such as the one that recently occurred on the eastbound off-ramp at Exit 18 of I-20 and closed the exit for several hours. To aggravate that situation, another tractor-trailer overturned just one mile west of the exit shortly after the tanker fire began.

Nicole Drey, who identified herself as an HOA, and a mechanical engineer at SRS where worse case scenarios are routinely analyzed, stated:

There is only have one entrance and exit coming into Stratford for the villas for Springstone and Stratford Hall. If there’s any kind of there’s any event, whether a tanker has an accident or explosion, we are stuck.”

b. The presence of a convenience store and gas station, combined with other recent commercial developments, will lower property values—a very difficult contention to prove without a detailed appraisal study.

c. Twenty years ago City Council passed a concept plan for the property that excluded the possibility of car washes, petroleum stations. People bought homes and property when those conditions were in place, but Council overruled that when it approved the LuLu’s Car Wash, and now claims:

Since no building permits were issued within 5 years of the original commercial component of the concept plan approval, the 2003 concept plan approval for the commercial component expired.” (City Manager Stuart Bedenbaugh memorandum to City Council, Page 53)

d. On March 27th, Parker’s Kitchen representative and former Goose Creek city planner Daniel Ben-Yisrael lobbied Aiken City Council for a hearing on their proposal. While not illegal, it was a breach of the planning process protocol, as developers should refrain from lobbying Council outside of the official process. The exchange, which began at the 21:30 mark of the meeting and featured eight interruptions by Mayor Osbon, lasted 4.5 minutes—1.5 minutes past the allowable comment time.

Mr. Ben-Yisrael was both correct and incorrect on one key point, that it was his understanding that traffic studies did not have to be final and approved before being heard by Aiken City Council. Another project being held up by a traffic study is the Sundy Street apartment complex proposed by a Charleston-area developer.

However, this is not typically the case. Two notable examples of this double standard on traffic studies include the Silver Bluff Shopping Center (2) and the Rutland Drive rental townhomes development. The former is a Village at Woodside project. Seven months after a traffic study was promised, and five months after it was ordered, the study remains incomplete. Yet, the project was unanimously approved without any submitted traffic study.

The owner of the Rutland Drive property includes former Aiken County assistant administrator and North Augusta City Manager Todd Glover— who addressed the Planning Commission and Council during the three hearings that preceded unanimous approval. The traffic study for that project is also incomplete.

This dichotomy suggests one standard for large, connected, local developers and another standard for smaller, downstate developers. The traffic management ordinance itself defines a single standard that says traffic studies shall be submitted during the approval process:

Where required by section 42-178, a traffic impact analysis study shall be submitted as part of any request for approval of a site plan change, an annexation, a rezoning to a category that allows more intense uses than currently allowed on the site, a major subdivision, a concept plan for a tract zoned commercial or planned unit development, or a request for city services except where the subject property is already developed and no redevelopment is proposed. This article shall apply to any new development or change to an existing site.” (City Code, Article VI, 42-176(a).

The standard for requiring a study is 100 trips during the peak hours of 7-9 a.m and 4-6 p.m. There is no specified consideration of existing traffic, or recognition of inherent safety risks at intersections or blind curves.

Water Guzzling Data Center.

As reported in “Is Google Coming to Aiken County, “ Aiken County Council approved an agreement with an unnamed tech company to build a Data Center in the Sage Mill Industrial Park area; where the County also has $5 million to spend from the SRS/plutonium settlement.

In short, the agreement lists only the benefits of the project—50 jobs and an $800 million investment—but not the costs. The latter likely includes the need for hundreds of thousands of gallons of water, although the necessary amount is as secret as the name of the involved company.

County Council negotiated this deal without openly divulging information on the known and potential environmental costs.

According to the Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC), this area is subject to newer groundwater extraction regulations as part of the relatively new “Western Capacity Area,” as well as surface water withdrawal rules. The DHEC web page on the subject states”

Groundwater withdrawal permits are required to withdraw and use groundwater equal to or greater than three million gallons in any month in the counties in these areas.”

Another Denial of Public Comment and Inquiry.

At the second reading of the Data Center, public comment was accepted but questions were prohibited.

On April 11th, during deliberation of a change in its by-laws, the City of Aiken Planning Commission denied any citizen comments or input during a public hearing when the by-laws were on the agenda. After introducing the agenda item, Chairman Ryan Reynolds stated,
at the 35 minute mark of the Public Hearing in which the by-law amendments were on the agenda: 

This is not necessarily a discussion for the public” 

While the changes were minor, barring citizen input during any announced Public Hearing simply sets a bad precedent.

The Overdue Feasibility Report

On February 6th, Aiken Corporation Consultant K.J. Jacobs, of the architectural firm McMillan, Pazden, and Smith, provided a timeline (below) for a “feasibility study” of the proposed Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) downtown office complex. The draft preliminary report was due in mid-April and the second public meeting for the first week of May. To date there have been no reports issued and no public meetings scheduled. No new website has been announced, and the Aiken Corporation website is not updated.

To comment on the SRNL plan, write to nationallabaikenproject@mcmillanpazdensmith.com


Footnotes:

(1) The claim was made at about the 1:19:30 mark of the February 14, 2023 Planning Commission meeting. The meeting minutes indicate that

Ms. Moultrie responded that the items on the agendas are still being vetted between the time that the application is received and the time it is heard so the applications cannot be shared in advance of meetings.”

The actual transcipt is as follows:

“Applications are submited 35 days ahead of time because there’s an extreme amount of vetting that has to occur. Just because we put legal ad out does not mean any of those applications have been vetted. These staff members don’t happen by Magic, we have to submit them to engineering, public safety, traffic engineers. We have to vet these against our own zoning ordinances.”

A FOIA request for staff reviews of the Parker’s Kitchen at Stratford proposal yielded only the notes from the October 2022 developer’s meeting and a January 5, 2023 memo from the city’s traffic studies consultant.

(2) Disclosure; I have worked as independent researcher on the Silver Bluff shopping center case in a paid capacity. Neither this article nor the FOIA request were billed.

It’s Smilax Season — Grab a Fork!

By Burt Glover


Walking the woods behind my house, I’m frequently stopped in my tracks by the barbed vines that catch my clothes and rake the flesh like cat claws. The aptly named catbrier (Smilax rotundafolia) is the culprit. Other smilax varieties in our neck of the woods include greenbrier, sawbrier, and the hulking bullbrier. You might mistake this plant for a rose vine, except that for the tendrils and leaves of the Smilax, which are smooth and heart- or oval-shaped. Smilax vines can grow 20 to 30 feet up into the air if their tendrils have sufficient vegetation to attach to.  

Briers have always symbolized pain and barriers, but also enchantment and protection. That old wicked witch shrouded Sleeping Beauty’s 100-year resting place with a seemingly impenetrable layer of briers. Brer Rabbit pleaded to Brer Fox, “Please, just don’t throw me in that brier patch” (knowing full well that it would be his salvation). There are so many other stories. I would be remiss if I did not mention this plant’s importance in popular culture. You may remember the Smurfs cartoons from the 90’s. I’m pretty sure that those Smurfberries they lived off of were from smilax vines. Put that in your Papa Smurf pipe and smoke it!

Lanceleaf greenbriar (Smilax smallii) is a favorite decoration in Carolina holiday celebrations. Also called “Christmas smilax,” this evergreen vine can be found woven into wreaths, centerpieces and garlands and hanging from chandeliers, doorways and church pulpits.

The Greek translation of “Smilax” is “poison.” This translation has been determined to indicate that it is an antidote to poison. Because of its fang-like thorns, they reckoned that it would be an antidote to snake bites. While that is probably not so, there are no parts of this plant that are deemed to be poisonous.

This landscape is full of young smilax vines right now, just right for eating.
Once the vines mature past the tender stage, the thorns harden and they begin to live up to their common names.
With age, the smilax vine becomes a work of art.

In my walks in the woods, I frequently munch on the growing stems of this plant — they are delicious raw or in salads. In springtime, the growing stems, leaves and clingy tendrils of any species are actually quite tasty. I collect a goodly handful of the tender stems, and saute them in butter. Being related to the asparagus family, it is a treat. The root, or rhizome that the vine grows from is another matter. 

The root of Jamaican variety of the vine (Smilax ornata) is used to make the drink Sarsaparilla. It was quite a popular drink amongst cowboys and sailors in the olden days. It turns out that, before antibiotics, this drink was seen as a popular remedy for certain ‘social diseases.’ Line me up, bartender! I’m pretty sure that sarsaparilla can be made from any variety of Smilax, but it is only with the addition of sassafras root and lots of sugar that its popularity took off with the masses of people. Root beer!

Otherwise, Smilax root is said to be edible. Certain hardy peoples have been said to crush it, soak it in water and obtain a type of flour from it or, alternately, used it to make a juice, or as a thickener in sauces. I attempted to do this once with a huge rootstock that I dug up (some of these grow up to 75 lbs.). I would only undertake the effort again if I were starving,

Though there is no hard scientific data to support the claims, patents for compounds derived from smilax have been granted — in 2001 for steroids with the ability to treat senile dementia and Alzheimers; in 2003 for flavonoids with the ability to treat autoimmune diseases and inflammatory reactions. Other compounds derived from the root have been studied as antivirals and as a treatment for liver cancer. Certainly this plant merits further investigation.  

Smilax varieties have been a part of our landscape for tens of thousands of years. Their small, white flower clusters attract a wide variety of bees, beetles, moths and butterflies. Their leaves are eaten by deer, rabbits and caterpillars. Their red to purple berries persist well into winter and provide a valuable food source for many animals, including turtles, deer, bears and dozens of species of birds. Beavers enjoy munching on their roots. Dense thickets of these vines provide shelter and protection from predators for a wide variety of birds and animals. Just ask Brer Rabbit.

__________________

A plateful of smilax vines for dinner, backdropped by their thorny friend, the rose. (All photos courtesy of Laura Lance).

Contributor Burt Glover became an accidental naturalist during his earliest childhood days exploring the dirt roads, backyards, polo field and barns of the Magnolia-Knox-Mead neighborhood of 1950s Aiken. Birds are his first love, and he can identify an impressive range by song alone. He asserts that he is an observer, not an expert, on the topics of his writings, which range from birds, box turtles, frogs and foraging, to wasps, weeds, weather and beyond.

Aiken’s Early Parks and Recreation: A Historical Perspective

Part One in a Series of Five or More
(Updated: April 30, 2023 and May 9, 2023)
Gyles Park 

On August 8, 2022, Aiken City Council voted unanimously (1) to approve a Master Plan (2) for the City’s parks recommending possible divestment of five neighborhood parks north of Colleton Avenue. Four of these parks are located in the predominantly Black, working class neighborhoods surrounding the Schofield campus. They are also within the original 1834 Dexter-Pascalis survey of Aiken. 

Among the five parks is Herbert Gyles Park — one of Aiken’s oldest designated parks — established in 1912 and named after Aiken’s then-mayor, Herbert E. Gyles. 

Grassy, open area on the western side of Gyles Park, with Union Street to the right.

In addition to its age, Gyles Park holds special historic and cultural significance. According a 1953 Aiken Standard article, this park was designated in 1912 to serve as a park for Aiken’s Black citizens, and was rededicated to this purpose on October 26, 1953.

Gyles Park was again rededicated thirty years later in a ceremony and “rededication festival” held on July 23, 1987, as conveyed in a newspaper account — minus mention of the first forty years of its history from 1912 forward, and minus the words “Negro” and “colored.” (3)

According to the 1987 Aiken Recreation and Parks director, it had “been years” since Gyles Park — with its freshly painted slides, swings and seesaws — had been used. (4) The article did not mention how many times, if any, the slides, swings and seesaws had been re-painted and maintained over the prior three decades.

Aiken Standard artcle. October 27, 1953.

Through today’s lens, donating a park to Black people might seem a progressive move in the 1912 Jim Crow South. History, viewed out of context, is often romanticized and easily misinterpreted. 

Some Context

A park located adjacent to and directly downwind of a 1912 train depot in the era of coal-fired engines was a sooty, smoky, dirty place to spend one’s time — and all the worse for its proximity to the railroad tracks, which would have made the area a uniquely dangerous place for children to play. One could surmise that the park was better suited, not so much as a park for children, but as a practical gathering place to stage the mules, carriages, and “Negro” laborers and servants appointed to the task of awaiting the comings and goings of Winter Colony northerners, Low Country southerners and their visitors who would require assistance to haul their cumbersome baggage, personages and visitors from the passenger station to the winter cottages and resort facilities. 

It was the custom during that time, and still is, to orient lower class, Black and minority neighborhoods adjacent to and downwind of toxic, noxious industries, city dumps, and/or the “bottoms” of a town, and to station the upper classes at higher points on the landscape. Train tracks, interstates, rivers and other natural barriers have long served as the dividing line between classes and races.

Recall that it was only nine years ago, in 2014, when the City of Aiken was making plans to build the long-requested, long-deferred northside park atop the old City dump at the edge of the Schofield neighborhood. The City had, in fact, already spent the prior ten years, since 2004, (5) alternately dragging its heels and working behind the scenes with landscape architects (6) and others to bring this plan to fruition.

This, after kicking the can down the road since the 1980s on requests to improve and upgrade recreation facilities on Aiken’s northside, while spending many millions on Aiken’s southside facilities. This, after subjecting generations of northside residents from the 1920s into the late 1970s to the need to coordinate their outdoor hours and laundry days to avoid the stench of burning and smoldering garbage, trash, yard waste, old furniture, dead animals, etc. at the City dump.

Below: Two screenshots from the Aiken City Council meeting minutes dated, March 9, 1970, regarding a 500-signature petition brought before Council by northside residents in complaint of the landfill. 

The Winds of Change

A 1951 Aiken Standard article spoke of the Herbert Gyles Park:  “A memorial to the good citizenship of Mr. Gyles is the Herbert Gyles park at the Southern Railway passenger station.” 

When the Herbert Gyles Park was rededicated in 1953, circumstances were different from 1912 or even 1951. For one thing, the passenger train was no longer in service. For another, Jim Crow was on its last legs. Court cases were pushing desegregation on every front. Southern leadership, feeling the winds of change bearing down upon them, went into overdrive creating “separate but equal” spaces and facilities to neutralize accusations of inequality and to preempt efforts to desegregate . As if to reinforce this newfangled equality, the word, “Negro” was prominently displayed in the newspaper announcements of these separate-but-equal facilities.

The rededicated Herbert Gyles Park of 1953 was appointed with “the most modern of equipment,” including two six-seat swings, a six-board seesaw, a sandbox, wading pool, merry-go-round, two slides, a horseshoe court, and two picnic tables. In the publicity surrounding this event, the park was unofficially redubbed as Gyles Negro Recreation Park, Gyles Park Negro Playground, Gyles Park Playground for Negro Children, the Negro Park, and so on. 

Enter the Bomb Plant

The much anticipated influx of bomb plant employees in 1953 only hastened the “separate but equal” impetus. Swimming pool access was a particularly prickly issue among segregationists at that time. Aiken already had at least three pools where White people could swim — the City pool on Newberry Street; the public swimming pool at “The Bath Club” on the Hofmann estate on Laurens Street; and the Fermata pool, which, by 1953, had been established as a Whites-only social club. There were no swimming pools for Aiken’s Black residents. 

In addition to the swimming pools were numerous Whites-only parks, ponds and lakes including Gregg Park, Clearwater Park, Vaucluse Pond, Aiken State Park, Johnson’s Lake, Scott’s Lake, and Richardson’s Lake. There were also numerous unofficial swimming holes in ponds, clay pits and streams throughout the county which enjoyed de facto segregation, as it was simply understood that Black people didn’t step foot into certain areas.

During 1951-1953, with tens of thousands of construction workers, DuPont employees and their families arriving to town, the winds of change bore down harder, still. The fact that the bomb plant was a federal facility only made the efforts to preserve Jim Crow all the more challenging, as federal laws — toothless as they were — still required creative effort to skirt. 

Two New Pools for Aiken

In March 1954, the City pool on Newberry Street was filled in and plans made to build a new City pool for White people. But first, in July 1954, the City began construction on the “Aiken Negro Pool” later to be named Smith Hazel Pool

By autumn 1954, the pool was finished, and local leaders could now boast that — between Eustis Park, the Smith Hazel pool and the recently-equipped Gyles Park — Aiken now had “equal” recreation facilities for all of its citizens.

Aiken Standard. August 12, 1954.

By year’s end, the construction of the pool at the circa 1897 Eustis Park complex was well under way to add a swimming pool to the existing tennis courts, baseball diamond, football field, and picnic grounds under the pines. A vibrant, community fundraising campaign was added to the mix to build a recreation center and teen canteen with a snack bar, the latter of which was completed in 1956. The pool officially opened in May 1955. Designed by Paddock of California, it was described as containing “the most modern equipment available” (7) including underwater lights, state-of-the-art filtration and an underwater vacuum. It also featured a second pool, a wading pool, for the younger set.

The completed Eustis Park facility enabled a full menu of recreation offerings for Aiken youth and adults — tennis lessons, baseball and softball games, swimming lessons, swim meets, concerts, dances, horse shows and festivals, plus dance lessons, and arts, crafts and ceramics classes, summer day camps and other special programs for teens and children.

The Smith Hazel pool site offered a smaller menu of extra activities and events, mostly seasonal parties, which were advertised as “weather permitting,” since there wasn’t a building to accommodate them. In 1963, and only after years of public calls for an activity center for Aiken’s Black residents, the Smith Hazel Recreation Center was built.

Swimming Lessons

Local Red Cross water safety classes had been held at the segregated Aiken State Park since the late 1930s. The influx of DuPont workers and their families in 1953 drove a campaign to offer classes throughout the county. (8). In 1953, classes were offered at eight of the Whites-only swimming venues. No options were offered to Black people. The situation was the same in the summer of1954, except that the Red Cross offered swimming lessons for Aiken’s Black residents over at the Jones Pool in Augusta, Georgia. (9)

In the summer of 1955 Red Cross classes were offered at the Smith Hazel Pool. In the summer of 1956, they were again offered at Smith Hazel, as well as “at a pond to be selected in a few days.” Swimming lessons were available for White people at numerous sites throughout Aiken County, including Aiken State Park, Johnson’s Lake, Scott’s Lake, Eustis Park, Fermata Club, Gem Lake, Double Springs, Gregg Park, Panic Pond, Gregory Lake, and the LBC recreation pool. (10)

Some Context

The establishment of these parks and recreational activities was backdropped by the larger story of the Civil Rights movement which was unfolding daily in newspapers, magazines and the evening news, giving Americans of all colors witness to the forms of retaliation faced by those who engaged in peaceful protest against segregation — the fire hoses, billy clubs and police dogs being sicced on children in 1963, the fire-bombing of a bus in Aniston, Alabama in 1961, the 1960 insecticide fumigation of sit-in protesters at a Krystal restaurant in Nashville, and the 1963 bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham killed four girls. Seeing these images — and on television, in particular — began to open more and more people’s eyes and minds to what the Civil Rights movement was really about.

Circumvention 

The “separate but equal” artifice was too expensive and impractical to erect with golf courses, public beaches and state parks. The response, then, was to simply close them down. Edisto Beach State Park, for instance, closed in 1956 in response to a lawsuit challenging its segregation — and it remained closed for ten years.

The SC park system had twenty-six parks (11) at that time:

  • 20 were segregated, Whites-only parks
  • 3 were segregated, Blacks-only parks — Pleasant Ridge, Campbell’s Pond, and Mill Creek.
  • 3 parks provided separate-use areas for Blacks and Whites — Lake Greenwood, Hunting Island, and Huntington Beach.

The 1067-acre Aiken State Park was a segregated, Whites-only park that was built by both White and Black Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) workers during 1934-1936. Oral stories tell of the grueling labor involved with hand-digging Fish Lake (see modern-day photo of Fish Lake at top of article). During the 1950s, the park, which is situated along the South fork of the Edisto River, featured several ponds, a spring-fed lake, and several artesian wells. Original amenities included cabins for overnight stays, swimming facilities, a bath house, a refreshment stand, boating, fishing, nature trails, and picnic grounds with tables, grills and barbecue pits. This grew to include a campground and baseball field. (12)

In 1963 — and, again, in response to a suit challenging South Carolina’s segregated state park system — the SC Forestry Commission, which oversaw the parks, closed down the entire park system, including Aiken State Park. They remained closed until 1966.

It was a similar story on municipal golf courses of that era, which were in the midst of a post-WWII boom. New courses were built, and old courses were improved to meet the demand. Among the golfers heading to greens across America were Black veterans, who’d enjoyed playing golf on courses overseas during the war, and found themselves barred from entering golf courses at home. Numerous lawsuits were brought, followed by numerous court-ordered, federal mandates for desegregation of municipal golf courses. Such lawsuits were not new, as golf courses had been on the forefront of desegregation lawsuits for decades.

Some cities circumvented court orders by leasing their municipal courses to private interests for as little as $1 per year. Others sold their their grounds to private interests. Still others filled in the holes with cement and outright closed the courses.

In 1959, Aiken City Council voted unanimously to sell the Aiken Municipal Golf course to a private interest. The City was nearing its 20 year agreement to operate the property as a municipal golf course, anyway, and, according to Council’s resolution, the course had operated at a loss for the past few years and become a burden on taxpayers. (13)

The 107-acre course, which had been “reasonably valued at some $100,000” fifteen years earlier in an ordinance signed by Mayor Wyman in 1944, (14) sold for $23,150. The sale price was about the cost of two modest, 3-bedroom ranch houses in 1959 Aiken. The buyer agreed to a number of restrictive clauses. (See clipping #1 in footnotes). The course was renamed Highland Park Country Club and, in 1960, a members-only swimming pool was added to the facility.

Thirty years later, in 1990, the Augusta National invited its first Black member, an event that made front page news in the NYT Sports Pages. (15) Other area golf clubs held similarly strict membership policies, although public discussion of such matters is considered indelicate.

__________________

UPDATE May 9, 2023: Updated to add two screenshots from the Aiken City Council meeting minutes, dated March 9, 1970, regarding a 500-signature petition brought before Council by northside residents in complaint of the landfill.

April 30, 2023: An earlier version of this article suggested that the circa 1912 Gyles Park might be Aiken’s oldest Park. That distinction could arguably be said to belong to the circa 1897 Eustis Park, donated to the city by Miss Celestine Eustis, and so-named in recognition of her efforts to preserve Aiken’s trees and forests. Eustis Park served Aiken recreation for many decades, first as a bicycle park, then a multi-faceted recreation complex that featured a horse park, football stadium, baseball park, tennis courts, picnic grounds and more. Eustis Park’s original 115 acres was whittled down over the years — first by the 47 acre, turn-of-the-century Park in the Pines resort hotel, (which burned in 1913), then, over the next 40 years, to house various county government functions, including hospital grounds, a health department, and public school system facilities, which included the Eustis Park schools. By 1965, according to then-Mayor Odell Weeks, the Eustis Park recreational complex had been reduced to less than  10 acres, a number that served to justify the City’s 1965 purchase of the Virginia Acres subdivision for development into a park on the southside. Three years later, the City received a federal grand to develop the recently demolished Virginia Acres subdivision into a park. Simultaneous to this, the City began negotiations with the Aiken County Hospital Board of Trustees to sell the Eustis Park recreational complex in its entirety. (The hospital had plans at that time, in 1971, to either build a new hospital on University Parkway, or to expand into the Eustis Park grounds). Here, it must be said that discussions on this sale occurred against an extremely contentious backdrop of local tension over integration in schools, housing and public places. Negotiations on the sale commenced from 1968 until 1972 to include talk of the “friendly condemnation suit” that would be necessary for the hospital to acquire the city-owned Eustis Park property, since the property had been given to the City in trust to be used as a recreational facility. In 1971, the City announced plans to build a “community park” on the Eustis Park public school property (not to be confused with the Eustis Park recreational complex) and to also build, “one of the most modern recreational facilities in the state” on the Virginia Acres property on the southside. The friendly condemnation suit was filed in the spring of 1972. In 2019, a senior-youth center was built aside the Eustis Park community park property and named the Lessie B. Price Aiken Senior and Youth Center in honor of the long-serving Councilwoman. The article has been updated to reflect this history. 

Next in the Series: The Virginia Acres Question

The above histories are incomplete, at best. The recording of racial histories, like so much history, has traditionally been piecemeal and only brought together, piece-by-piece and perspective by perspective, over time. I welcome further contributions to the history I’ve presented here.
____________________

This series is written in memory of my father, Arthur H. Dexter. His files on these histories led me to further research and to complete some of the stories he started, but didn’t have opportunity to finish. My father would have been 100 years old today.

(1) See August 8, 2022 Aiken City Council minutes, pgs 9-10.
https://edoc.cityofaikensc.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2752803&dbid=0&repo=City-of-Aiken-LF

(2) Clemson University/City of Aiken Parks, Recreation and Tourism Master Plan, pgs 22-23.
https://edoc.cityofaikensc.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2749640&dbid=0&repo=City-of-Aiken-LF

(3) Greene, Kelly. “A New Beginning! Hundreds Attend Rededication Festival for Aiken’s Gyles Park. “ Aiken Standard, July 26, 1987.

(4) “Gyles Park Re-Opens Tomorrow with Jamboree, Re-dedication.” Aiken Standard. July 24, 1987

(5) Lord, Philip. “Talks Mount to Turn Landfill into Park.” Aiken Standard, February 6, 2004.

(6) World Landscape Architect. “Northside Park | Aiken USA | Pearson Russell Design.” WLA. https://worldlandscapearchitect.com/northside-park-aiken-usa-pearson-russell-design-associates/?v=7516fd43adaa

(7) “Aiken Pool Will Open Here Sunday.” Aiken Standard. May 13, 1955.

(8) “Plans Have Been Completed for the Red Cross Water Safety Program Here.” Aiken Standard. June 3, 1953.

(9) “Swimming Classes for Negro Youth.” Aiken Standard. July 20, 1954.

(10) “RC’s County-Wide Water Safety Program to Train All Age Groups During Summer.” The City of Aiken Page. May 22, 1956.

(11) South Carolina State Parks, “Civil Rights Movement.” https://southcarolinaparks.com/civil-rights-movement

(12) “Aiken State Park is Fine for Outings” Aiken Standard. June 20, 1947.

(13) “Golf Course Sold to Charlotte Pro.” Aiken Standard. February 24, 1959. (See clipping #1 below)

(14) “Aiken Golf Club Ordinance.” Aiken Standard. September 6, 1944. (See clipping #2 below)

(15) Diaz, Jaime. “Augusta National Admits First Black Member.” New York Times. September 11, 1990.


Restrictive clauses included with 1959 sale of the Aiken Municipal Golf course

Excerpt from the 1944 ordinance on the Aiken Golf Club, signed by Mayor Wyman.