Kudzu: The Gift that Keeps on Giving

By Burt Glover
May 27, 2023

During the 1960s, Clarks Hill was our family’s playground, and our houseboat at Fishing Village was our home away from home. The announcement that we were going to “the lake” always generated so much excitement! The 50-minute drive between Aiken and Plum Branch, however, was merely to be endured.

Nothing much to see but the occasional old country store with its “hubcap” coke signs and “Colonial Is Good Bread” screen doors and, here and there, a large old house with weathered paint. In-between were peach orchards, loblollies, banks of red clay, and kudzu. Lots of kudzu: kudzu consuming electric poles, old houses, entire trees, rusted cars and, here and there, massive kudzu topiaries as far as the eye could see. This was the South as I knew it. I assumed it would always be this way.

Kudzu was first introduced by the Japanese at the big US Centennial Exposition in 1876 Philadelphia. What a wonderful vine — by 1900, many Southerners were lured into planting a vine or two to provide shade for their sunny porches. How quickly they grow! The government soon got involved. From the 1930s to the 1950s, the virtues of kudzu were extolled. It could control erosion on depleted Southern cotton field soils, and to provide a feed crop for livestock (so much superior to alfalfa!) Depression era farmers were paid $8 per acre to plant it, and the Civilian Conservation Corps planted 85 million plants throughout the South. Kudzu clubs and festivals with Kudzu Queens were formed. Such a noble vine! A miracle! What could go wrong?

As time progressed into the 1950’s, the shine began to wear off of the miracle vine. Kudzu became regarded as the “mile-a-minute” vine. Stories emerged of the vines growing into houses and snatching babies out of their cribs in the night. With its rapid spread, kudzu became known as “the vine that ate the South.” This savior of the South had consumed 7 million acres, and was advancing another 100,000 acres per year when the government finally declared it to be a weed in 1972 then, in the 1990’s, an “invasive” weed.  

I became interested in Kudzu in the 1990’s. There were many large patches of it around, most notably on Pine Log Road. I had read that Kudzu flour, made from the roots of the vine (some of those approaching the size and weight of a  200 to 300 lb. man), was selling for $20-$30 per pound. I never found any giant roots in those almost impenetrable masses of vines. My only consolation was being inundated with the delicious grape-like scent of their wine-colored flowers as I toiled away.

Some people, especially the current Kudzu Queen of Rutherfordton, North Carolina, extol the virtues of the plant. Her suggestion — boil the hairy leaves in salt water, then batter and deep fry to make a delicious potato chip-like snack. (Might battered, deep-fried tree bark be palatable, as well?) If you can somehow manage to singe or peel the hairs off of its fast growing shoots, you may end up with a very nutritious green bean-tasting vegetable dish. Smaller roots can be roasted like potatoes.The blossoms can be used to make a tea, or a grape, Jolly Rancher-flavored jelly. Kudzu is in the legume family of plants, along with soybeans and peanuts. Ironically, kudzu pods and seeds are the only part of the plant that isn’t edible.

Medicinally, kudzu has been used for centuries as a remedy for treating diabetes, heart disease, cluster headaches, diarrhea, psoriasis, muscle pain, menopause symptoms, sinus infections and anxiety. Harvard Medical has isolated the compound Daidzin from the vine– useful for reducing cravings for alcohol. With proper study, this plant could prove to be a valuable source of useful compounds.

Kudzu may never completely disappear from the South, but its former prevalence does seem to be waning. Traditional herbicides have proven to be mostly ineffective at control, but a few years of grazing goats have been found to keep the plant at bay. Human development seems to be the most successful eradication of kudzu. Simply scalp the land, then plant a Dollar General and a parking lot, or a housing development.

Interestingly, in 2009, there were a few bugs that hitchhiked on a plane from Asia to Atlanta. Kudzu bugs — a natural control for kudzu! The bugs have been spreading outward since. Time to rejoice? Well, not quite. Though they do a number on the vines, they are also attracted to other legume crops, such as beans, soybeans, peas, peanuts, and in the wintertime, they will find cracks in your home and congregate to escape cold weather. Kudzu bugs are members of the stinkbug family, and if you inadvertently squish one, you’ll wish you hadn’t. Nowadays, if you look online, the articles on controlling kudzu are quickly being outnumbered by the articles on how to control kudzu bugs. Be careful what you wish for.

With climate disruption and eradication efforts, Kudzu seems to be migrating out of the South and heading northward… even as far north as Canada. I hope that it will never completely disappear from our environs. That would certainly diminish the heritage that is truly ours.  

_____________________

Contributor Burt Glover became an accidental naturalist during his earliest childhood days exploring the dirt roads, backyards, polo field and barns of the Magnolia-Knox-Mead neighborhood of 1950s Aiken. Birds are his first love, and he can identify an impressive range by song alone. He asserts that he is an observer, not an expert, on the topics of his writings, which range from birds, box turtles, frogs and foraging, to wasps, weeds, weather and beyond

Local Residents Speak Out On Parker’s Kitchen

Letters to the Editor
May 22, 2023

Editor’s Note: Below is a digest of letters received from local residents opposed to the Parker’s Kitchen 24-hour fuel station-convenience store proposed for the corner of Whiskey Road and Stratford Drive.

From Jean Greenwald:

It’s a shame the residents of Springstone Villas and surrounding neighbors of Stratford Hall and Springstone find ourselves once again at odds with City Officials who have already ignored conditions on Planned Commercial zoning that included no car washes and also saddled us with Lulu’s on a portion of the parcel.

Now, they want to put in a Parker’s Kitchen — a 24 hour fuel sale/ fried chicken fast food franchise — something that violates three more of those conditions, including no fuel sales, no 24-hour businesses of any kind, and no fast food. Officials seemed to have a case of amnesia during the first reading of this Parker’s Concept Plan — with the exception of Councilwoman Lessie Price, who was the only one who seemed to remember and acknowlede the conditions on this parcel, as she seconded that 2003 motion to approve the zoning conditions attached to the Planned Commercial that would protect and buffer our homes. Ms. Price also made the motion to continue this item after listening to the citizen’s concerns. She was one of only two Council members that did not vote to approve Lulu’s in 2020 . Councilwoman Gail Diggs was the other.

The rest of this very same board not only pretended those conditions had magically fallen off the zoning, but 3 of them then had the audacity to scold our citizens while voting to approve the car wash on the parcel that prohibited car washes.   However, the citizens were very well aware of the zoning conditions at that time ; they knew it planned commercial with “zoning conditions,” including no car washes and no fuel sales among others.  

Therefore, an apology from these Council members to our citizens should be forthcoming!   The concerns are many surrounding Parker’s Kitchen, which they are asking to be put on another section of this same parcel, but at the top of the list are public safety concerns. Putting a fuel station at the entrance to a residential street which is the only way in and out for 3 subdivisions is a disaster waiting to happen! You need simply to drive down Whiskey Rd. to assess this, no expensive traffic study or planning degree needed.

Common sense and ethical fortitude on the part of Officials is what residents are looking for.

Our homes are well kept, our neighborhood is mostly retired people who have worked hard for what they have and are trying to enjoy retirement. Instead we find ourselves once again going to battle with officials. The Council used covid as justification to limit the numbers of people in hearings when Lulu’s was approved in 2020, but there was still huge opposition.

The opposition against building a Parker’s Kitchen in this location only continues to grow as the word gets out. We are looking at everything with a fine-tooth comb and getting more organized to protect our neighborhoods. This is the second major battle in 3 years with this Council, which seems to view Whiskey Rd. as a dumping ground for anything a developer asks.  

We are very aware that this same Council is making decisions that threaten to destroy our beautiful historic downtown district as well. These councilmembers have not been good stewards of our beautiful city (see Project Pascalis or Whiskey Road), and now they are coming for our backyard. We won’t stop fighting for what we know is right. Our quality of life and our safety depend on it.  Council should do the right thing and tell Parker’s to find a more suitable location — but instead the resident are being tasked with this responsibility.

Jean Greenwald
Aiken, S.C.

From Mary Camlet-Agresta:

Many of us in Spring Stone are worried about the outcome of having a Parkers Kitchen on Whiskey Rd and Stratford Drive. Not only is it our only way in and out, but with a Parkers, they are expecting over 2100 vehicles in and out every single day. If they are allowed to do a cut through onto Stratford behind their building, what a nightmare that will be. 

Doesn’t sound bad? You have to live here to understand. 

That is not the worst of it by a long shot.

Let’s talk about a fuel delivery every day. What happens when there is an accident? Fuel spill, fire, potential fatalities. There were several tanker accidents lately and the outcome was not good. 

Let’s talk about emissions, pollution and carcinogens that cause many many health issues like cancer. Why, you say? Did you know the one of many components is benzene? If you are not familiar, please look it up.

Let’s talk about the fact of this particular parcel is “planned commercial with conditions.” Meaning, no gas stations, for one. This has never expired, as the council will have you believe. 

Everything I have mentioned and more is accounted for in writing and on video.

If you want to know more concerning issues, if you are concerned for yourself and your children, if you do not want any more congestion on Whiskey Road, please come to the council meeting scheduled for May 22 at 7 pm. [Editor’s note: This item has since been moved to the June 12 meeting]

Hope to see many of you there.

Mary Camlet-Agresta 
Aiken, SC

From Diane Salsitz

Residents of Spring Stone, Stratford Hall and Sprinstone Villa’s voiced their concerns over use  of Stratford Drive for entrance to Parkers and LuLu’s, all of which are valid.

We now have questions which we feel should be answered. The questions are for those on the Planning and Zoning Commission from those of us who will be affected by this decision if Parker’s Kitchen is approved.

  1. Has South Carolina DOT approved the increased weight load on Stratford Drive that Parkers will bring?  It’s our understanding a gasoline tanker with 850 gallons of gasoline will be making 2 or 3 stops or more weekly to fill gas tanks at Parkers. 
  2. Parkers will be lit from dusk to dawn. No more complete darkness for some who have been accustomed to it being so when they retire for the night.
  3. What happens if there is an accident involving a gas tanker delivering 850 gallons of gasoline to Parker’s?  An  explosion? Or a gas leak?  Look what happened at Fredericksburg Maryland. A gasoline tanker overturned killing the driver. Residents in the surrounding area had to leave their homes for clean-up to take place.   
  4. Who will be responsible for damages to residents or their property? As noted at the last LuLu’s plan, that’s a question that needs answering! How the heck could one get out should this happen? ONE of many questions that should be answered as lives could  be in danger. The residents in these three sub division have everything thing to lose if that happens. The city loses nothing other than city taxes etc.  So far, it’s very one-sided. Human lives can and will be affected.

Accidents can’t always be avoided. That’s why they are called accidents, One must always allow  for them just the same. Putting things where they can’t hurt others is a way to begin.

Just look what happened in Ohio. The train derailment — an accident that should have never happened. Yet it did! The life of the residents in that town will never be the same. These people will never have peace of mind. Granted they may or will receive compensation for their losses, health etc. But what about long term health issues?

I wouldn’t want to have that worry. What about all of you?

Diane Salsitz
Aiken, SC

Uncertainties Plague Downtown Lab

Guest Editorial by Dick Dewar

May 22, 2023

On January 23, 2023. I attended the State of the City speech by Mayor Osbon. He had promised some new developments in response to Project Pascalis. We were not disappointed. I suspected that some in the audience knew exactly what the speech would contain. 

Mayor Pro Tem Ed Woltz announced that Governor Henry McMaster and our legislative delegation have committed to investing in a new workforce development center for the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL).  Former AMDC Members, Chairman Keith Wood, Vice Chair Chris Verenes, and Chamber President David Jameson identified this as an opportunity more than a year ago. That would have been in early 2022.

They worked tirelessly lobbying to get the funding for it and to have it located here in Aiken.  Small group meetings were held without public notice or participation to determine where this structure would be built.  THE FINAL DECISION ON WHERE THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE BUILT IS DETERMINED BY SRNL.  The only requirement was that it had to be built in Aiken County. So if you are disturbed about the location of the building, the fault lies with SRNL.

The Mayor insisted in his speech that “none of this is a done deal and City Council has had initial discussions about it, but nothing is even close to being finalized.” Yet not one public meeting has been held to affect the decision on where this building would be built. 

In a public release dated May 16, 2023, “The SC Joint Bond Review Committee today accepted the allocation of $20 million TOWARD the construction of a state-of-the-art facility for SRNL in downtown Aiken.” Please note that the $20 million may not cover the total cost of the building and the City will be liable for the remainder. “The funding obligation gives the responsibility for producing a new home for the SRNL workforce development center to the City of Aiken” This is contrast to what a member of the Aiken delegation has stated. SRNL had TOTAL AUTHORITY on where this center can be built.

Somehow between the mayor’s speech on January 23, 2023, SRNL made the decision on where the center would be built. No doubt they may have been influenced by the members of the Aiken Municipal Development Commission (AMDC) and members of Aiken City Council. A major influence on the location of the SRNL center is that it justifies the construction of a parking garage which will cost Aiken taxpayers another $7 million,   

On March 13, the City approved a $250,000 no-bid professional services contract with the Aiken Corporation in violation of a city ordinance which requires that contracts of this size be put to bid. This is a blatant violation of a City Ordinance. Yet no comment from the City Attorney.

This no-bid contract also states that “the Aiken Corporation will oversee the construction phase eventually owning the building.”

The Aiken Corporation is a non-profit organization created by and serving at the discretion of Aiken City Council, but acts in an INDEPENDENT manner. Its primary donor is the City of Aiken. Such an arrangement is known as “quasi governmental”. Once again, non-elected members of the community get to make major financial decisions with no public input or scrutiny,

It is worth highlighting the fact that the City of Aiken built the Aiken Department of Safety building by bidding for its construction and the facility was built on time and on budget.

It is also worth noting that the City of Aiken built the Lessie B. Price Senior Center using the same process. It was built on time and on budget.

Finally, the City of Aiken built its new headquarters using the same process and it was finished on budget. 

Why do we need a different procedure for the SRNL center? Why do we need to give the building away to a “quasi governmental” agency?

At this point, it appears the City will give the Aiken Corporation four of the seven properties involved in the massive $9.6 million AMDC purchase: 

  • Warneke Cleaners, McGhee Building (includes old CC Johnson Drug Store), and Taj Restaurant, collectively purchased for $2.25 million. 
  • Holley House, purchased for $2.125 million (half of the $4.25 million Hotel Aiken/Holley House purchase). 

This is money to be given to the Aiken Corporation with zero return to the City essentially a loss of $4.375 million.

This leaves the City still owning:

  • The Hotel Aiken, purchased for $2.125 million. 
  • The Beckman Building at 106 Laurens Street, purchased for $1 million. 
  • Newberry Hall, purchased for $2 million.” 

With this plan, the Aiken Corporation will own the building, charge rent to SRNL, and probably have the City be responsible for maintenance, upkeep, and utilities. Also keep in mind that the City is responsible for the entire cost of the building. If it costs $25 or $30 million, the City would pay everything in excess of $20 million.

SRNL’s decision removes currently taxable property in the middle of our downtown making it no longer taxable. What is the cost of this action over the next 20 years?

I would prefer that a responsible developer determine how much the building would cost before any financial commitment is made by the City. It is shocking that there is no Memorandum of Agreement between SRNL and the City of Aiken outlining SRNL’s requirements which would enable the City to more accurately determine the cost of construction. 

We don’t need the Aiken Corporation involved. It makes no financial sense.

Call the Mayor and your council member to protest this process. Demand more financial data before any commitment is made.

Attend City Council meeting to do the same. 

Dick Dewar
Aiken, SC

________________


Dick Dewar was elected in 2007 to Aiken City Council District 3 and served three terms. He did not seek reelection in 2019.

The Future of Warneke Cleaners

The  letter below was submitted by Don Moniak to NationalLabAikenProject@mcmillanpazdansmith.com on April 18, 2023. No answer has been forthcoming from Aiken Corporation contractor McMillan Pazdan and Smith, who is responsible for the “pre development” phase of the proposed downtown Savannah River National Laboratory “Workforce Development Center.”  To make room for the lab office complex, the City of Aiken proposes to demolish Warnkeke Cleaners and the Holley House motel.

The proposal to demolish the historic Warneke Cleaners building and move the business to another nearby location on Richland Avenue was announced at the January 23, 2023 State of the City Address by Mayor Pro Tem Ed Woltz. The viability of this proposal appears to lack validity under the City’s Zoning Ordinance, which prohibits light industrial uses such as dry cleaners in the downtown business district.


Comments and Questions may still be sent to NationalLabAikenProject@mcmillanpazdansmith.com for consideration in the ongoing feasibility study.


From: Donald Moniak
Date: Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 8:59 AM
Subject: More questions.
To: National Lab Aiken Project

“Mr. Jacobs, 

Some more questions for your “feasibilty study.” 

1. What is the status of the first report compared to the timeline provided on February 6th? 

2. Why has there been no website established to solicit information, questions, and comments? 

3. In regard to Warneke’s Cleaners, the initial report from COA was that it would be relocated to another nearby downtown location. How can a dry cleaner be relocated when dry cleaning is a prohibited use in the downtown district; and the two that exist now are allowed only as a nonconforming use? 

1. City Councilman Ed Woltz is on the record as having said : 

The plan is to preserve the existing businesses on the Block leaving Newbury Hall  untouched, relocate Warneke Cleaners to the buildings at front of Richland Avenue. These retail buildings on Richland Avenue will be renting and upgraded as part of the project and the Thai [Taj Aiken, which features Indian cuisine] restaurant would remain on Richland Avenue.”

2. However, the current zoning ordinance does not provide for dry cleaners as a permitted use in the downtown business district. Dry cleaners qualify as light industrial due to their status as a polluting entity. ” 

Section 3.2.6(c)(2) of the COA Zoning Ordinance identifies dry cleaners as a light industrial use. 

Light industrial use is prohibited in the downtown business district

Under Section 8.1.4, Nonconforming uses, the ordinance reads: 

“Any use lawfully existing at the time of enactment of this Ordinance may be continued even though it does not conform with the provisions of this Ordinance for the District in which it is located. Similarly, whenever a text amendment or rezoning renders a use nonconforming, any existing lawful use may be continued. However, no building or structure or premises where a nonconforming use has ceased for more than 12 months, or has changed to a permitted or conforming use, shall again be used in a nonconforming manner.” 

So how can Warneke’s be relocated within the downtown, as promised by City Council, when dry cleaners cannot be established downtown? Who was going to pay for this very expensive move even if it was allowed? 

4. Are Warneke’s and Taj Restaurant being offered the opportunity to purchase their own buildings and property, much like Newberry Hall had that option in their previous lease? 

Thank You, 

Donald Moniak


Photos of letter (click to enlarge)

A Brief Primer on 2023 City of Aiken Elections

UPDATED May 23, 2023 to include information on SC State Ethics Commission requirements for candidates running for municipal offices.

UPDATED June 6, 2023 to correct closing date for filing to 12:00 noon, Monday July 10, 2023, per the City’s posted notice of 6/2/23.

By request, The Aiken Chronicles is posting information on 2023 City of Aiken elections. First, some basic information from Section 14 in the Aiken City Code.

Qualifications and Open Seats

Sec. 14-1. – Election of mayor and council members.
The mayor shall be elected from the city at large, and one member of council shall be elected from each of the six districts set forth and designated upon the map and accompanying documents entitled “City of Aiken Election Plan (2012)” that are on file in the official records maintained by the city clerk. The City of Aiken Election Plan (2012) in its entirety is incorporated into this section by reference. Candidates seeking election to council from one of the six districts must be a resident of the district for which the candidate is seeking election and, if elected, must continue to be a resident of that district for the entire term of office. Candidates seeking election as mayor must be a resident of the city and, if elected, must continue to be a resident of the city for the entire term of office.

Sec. 14-2. – Terms of Office. 
The mayor and members of council shall be elected for terms of four years. Commencing with the 2013 general municipal election, council members for Districts 2, 4, 5 and 6 shall be elected. Commencing with the 2015 general municipal election, the mayor and council members for Districts 1 and 3 shall be elected. The districts referred to in this section are those set forth and designated upon the map and accompanying documents identified in section 14-1.

Accordingly, the office of mayor and the seats for Districts 1 and 3 (Councilwoman Gail Diggs and Councilwoman Kay Brohl, respectively) are up for grabs in 2023.

City Council Districts

Other information on elections, including detailed descriptions of the city council districts , can be found elsewhere in Section 14 at the links above.

Click on the map below to access an interactive map and close-up views of city council districts at the City of Aiken website.

Where and When to File?

The filing period for the 2023 election begins at noon on Monday, July 3, 2023 and closes at noon on Monday, July 10, 2023. The City of Aiken General Election will be held on November 7, 2023.

The contact for Democratic Party candidates is Aiken Democratic Party Chairman Harold Crawford Jr. at 803-215-5509. The filing location is Democratic Party headquarters at 410 Richland Avenue West in Aiken.

The contact for Republican candidates is Aiken Republican Party Chairwoman Debbie Epling at 803-599-8660. The filing location is Republican Party headquarters at 127 Greenville Street SW in Aiken.

Other political party candidates can contact their respective state party leadership for information on filing.

Additional SC State Ethics Commission Requirements

Candidates filing in July 2023 for a November 2023 run for office in Aiken, SC will need to familiarize themselves with SC State Ethics Commission requirements provided in the link below. The following forms need to be filed:

  • Immediately upon filing for office, file a “Statement of Economic Interests” disclosing sources of income to household. (This step not necessary for non-partisan races unless candidate wins, in which case the “Statement of Economic Interests” must be filed before taking oath of office). 
  • Immediately upon filing for office, open a campaign checking account through which all campaign transactions must be processed. 
  • The instant that a total of $500 in transactions (a combined total of spending and/or receiving) is reached in the campaign checking account, the candidate must file an “Initial Campaign Disclosure.”
  • Additionally, a “Campaign Disclosure” must be filed on the 10th of the month following any quarter in which there is a balance in the campaign checking account. (e.g. Oct 10, Jan 10, April 10….).  
  • Additionally, no matter whether any money was ever received or spent, the candidate must file a “Pre-Election Campaign Disclosure” by October 18-23, 2023. 

Failure to do the above can result in large fines. Additional requirements plus instructions for filing these forms can be found at https://ethics.sc.gov/sites/ethics/files/Documents/Brochures/2023CandidateNewsletter.pdf

___________________