Local Residents Speak Out On Parker’s Kitchen

Letters to the Editor
May 22, 2023

Editor’s Note: Below is a digest of letters received from local residents opposed to the Parker’s Kitchen 24-hour fuel station-convenience store proposed for the corner of Whiskey Road and Stratford Drive.

From Jean Greenwald:

It’s a shame the residents of Springstone Villas and surrounding neighbors of Stratford Hall and Springstone find ourselves once again at odds with City Officials who have already ignored conditions on Planned Commercial zoning that included no car washes and also saddled us with Lulu’s on a portion of the parcel.

Now, they want to put in a Parker’s Kitchen — a 24 hour fuel sale/ fried chicken fast food franchise — something that violates three more of those conditions, including no fuel sales, no 24-hour businesses of any kind, and no fast food. Officials seemed to have a case of amnesia during the first reading of this Parker’s Concept Plan — with the exception of Councilwoman Lessie Price, who was the only one who seemed to remember and acknowlede the conditions on this parcel, as she seconded that 2003 motion to approve the zoning conditions attached to the Planned Commercial that would protect and buffer our homes. Ms. Price also made the motion to continue this item after listening to the citizen’s concerns. She was one of only two Council members that did not vote to approve Lulu’s in 2020 . Councilwoman Gail Diggs was the other.

The rest of this very same board not only pretended those conditions had magically fallen off the zoning, but 3 of them then had the audacity to scold our citizens while voting to approve the car wash on the parcel that prohibited car washes.   However, the citizens were very well aware of the zoning conditions at that time ; they knew it planned commercial with “zoning conditions,” including no car washes and no fuel sales among others.  

Therefore, an apology from these Council members to our citizens should be forthcoming!   The concerns are many surrounding Parker’s Kitchen, which they are asking to be put on another section of this same parcel, but at the top of the list are public safety concerns. Putting a fuel station at the entrance to a residential street which is the only way in and out for 3 subdivisions is a disaster waiting to happen! You need simply to drive down Whiskey Rd. to assess this, no expensive traffic study or planning degree needed.

Common sense and ethical fortitude on the part of Officials is what residents are looking for.

Our homes are well kept, our neighborhood is mostly retired people who have worked hard for what they have and are trying to enjoy retirement. Instead we find ourselves once again going to battle with officials. The Council used covid as justification to limit the numbers of people in hearings when Lulu’s was approved in 2020, but there was still huge opposition.

The opposition against building a Parker’s Kitchen in this location only continues to grow as the word gets out. We are looking at everything with a fine-tooth comb and getting more organized to protect our neighborhoods. This is the second major battle in 3 years with this Council, which seems to view Whiskey Rd. as a dumping ground for anything a developer asks.  

We are very aware that this same Council is making decisions that threaten to destroy our beautiful historic downtown district as well. These councilmembers have not been good stewards of our beautiful city (see Project Pascalis or Whiskey Road), and now they are coming for our backyard. We won’t stop fighting for what we know is right. Our quality of life and our safety depend on it.  Council should do the right thing and tell Parker’s to find a more suitable location — but instead the resident are being tasked with this responsibility.

Jean Greenwald
Aiken, S.C.

From Mary Camlet-Agresta:

Many of us in Spring Stone are worried about the outcome of having a Parkers Kitchen on Whiskey Rd and Stratford Drive. Not only is it our only way in and out, but with a Parkers, they are expecting over 2100 vehicles in and out every single day. If they are allowed to do a cut through onto Stratford behind their building, what a nightmare that will be. 

Doesn’t sound bad? You have to live here to understand. 

That is not the worst of it by a long shot.

Let’s talk about a fuel delivery every day. What happens when there is an accident? Fuel spill, fire, potential fatalities. There were several tanker accidents lately and the outcome was not good. 

Let’s talk about emissions, pollution and carcinogens that cause many many health issues like cancer. Why, you say? Did you know the one of many components is benzene? If you are not familiar, please look it up.

Let’s talk about the fact of this particular parcel is “planned commercial with conditions.” Meaning, no gas stations, for one. This has never expired, as the council will have you believe. 

Everything I have mentioned and more is accounted for in writing and on video.

If you want to know more concerning issues, if you are concerned for yourself and your children, if you do not want any more congestion on Whiskey Road, please come to the council meeting scheduled for May 22 at 7 pm. [Editor’s note: This item has since been moved to the June 12 meeting]

Hope to see many of you there.

Mary Camlet-Agresta 
Aiken, SC

From Diane Salsitz

Residents of Spring Stone, Stratford Hall and Sprinstone Villa’s voiced their concerns over use  of Stratford Drive for entrance to Parkers and LuLu’s, all of which are valid.

We now have questions which we feel should be answered. The questions are for those on the Planning and Zoning Commission from those of us who will be affected by this decision if Parker’s Kitchen is approved.

  1. Has South Carolina DOT approved the increased weight load on Stratford Drive that Parkers will bring?  It’s our understanding a gasoline tanker with 850 gallons of gasoline will be making 2 or 3 stops or more weekly to fill gas tanks at Parkers. 
  2. Parkers will be lit from dusk to dawn. No more complete darkness for some who have been accustomed to it being so when they retire for the night.
  3. What happens if there is an accident involving a gas tanker delivering 850 gallons of gasoline to Parker’s?  An  explosion? Or a gas leak?  Look what happened at Fredericksburg Maryland. A gasoline tanker overturned killing the driver. Residents in the surrounding area had to leave their homes for clean-up to take place.   
  4. Who will be responsible for damages to residents or their property? As noted at the last LuLu’s plan, that’s a question that needs answering! How the heck could one get out should this happen? ONE of many questions that should be answered as lives could  be in danger. The residents in these three sub division have everything thing to lose if that happens. The city loses nothing other than city taxes etc.  So far, it’s very one-sided. Human lives can and will be affected.

Accidents can’t always be avoided. That’s why they are called accidents, One must always allow  for them just the same. Putting things where they can’t hurt others is a way to begin.

Just look what happened in Ohio. The train derailment — an accident that should have never happened. Yet it did! The life of the residents in that town will never be the same. These people will never have peace of mind. Granted they may or will receive compensation for their losses, health etc. But what about long term health issues?

I wouldn’t want to have that worry. What about all of you?

Diane Salsitz
Aiken, SC

Uncertainties Plague Downtown Lab

Guest Editorial by Dick Dewar

May 22, 2023

On January 23, 2023. I attended the State of the City speech by Mayor Osbon. He had promised some new developments in response to Project Pascalis. We were not disappointed. I suspected that some in the audience knew exactly what the speech would contain. 

Mayor Pro Tem Ed Woltz announced that Governor Henry McMaster and our legislative delegation have committed to investing in a new workforce development center for the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL).  Former AMDC Members, Chairman Keith Wood, Vice Chair Chris Verenes, and Chamber President David Jameson identified this as an opportunity more than a year ago. That would have been in early 2022.

They worked tirelessly lobbying to get the funding for it and to have it located here in Aiken.  Small group meetings were held without public notice or participation to determine where this structure would be built.  THE FINAL DECISION ON WHERE THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE BUILT IS DETERMINED BY SRNL.  The only requirement was that it had to be built in Aiken County. So if you are disturbed about the location of the building, the fault lies with SRNL.

The Mayor insisted in his speech that “none of this is a done deal and City Council has had initial discussions about it, but nothing is even close to being finalized.” Yet not one public meeting has been held to affect the decision on where this building would be built. 

In a public release dated May 16, 2023, “The SC Joint Bond Review Committee today accepted the allocation of $20 million TOWARD the construction of a state-of-the-art facility for SRNL in downtown Aiken.” Please note that the $20 million may not cover the total cost of the building and the City will be liable for the remainder. “The funding obligation gives the responsibility for producing a new home for the SRNL workforce development center to the City of Aiken” This is contrast to what a member of the Aiken delegation has stated. SRNL had TOTAL AUTHORITY on where this center can be built.

Somehow between the mayor’s speech on January 23, 2023, SRNL made the decision on where the center would be built. No doubt they may have been influenced by the members of the Aiken Municipal Development Commission (AMDC) and members of Aiken City Council. A major influence on the location of the SRNL center is that it justifies the construction of a parking garage which will cost Aiken taxpayers another $7 million,   

On March 13, the City approved a $250,000 no-bid professional services contract with the Aiken Corporation in violation of a city ordinance which requires that contracts of this size be put to bid. This is a blatant violation of a City Ordinance. Yet no comment from the City Attorney.

This no-bid contract also states that “the Aiken Corporation will oversee the construction phase eventually owning the building.”

The Aiken Corporation is a non-profit organization created by and serving at the discretion of Aiken City Council, but acts in an INDEPENDENT manner. Its primary donor is the City of Aiken. Such an arrangement is known as “quasi governmental”. Once again, non-elected members of the community get to make major financial decisions with no public input or scrutiny,

It is worth highlighting the fact that the City of Aiken built the Aiken Department of Safety building by bidding for its construction and the facility was built on time and on budget.

It is also worth noting that the City of Aiken built the Lessie B. Price Senior Center using the same process. It was built on time and on budget.

Finally, the City of Aiken built its new headquarters using the same process and it was finished on budget. 

Why do we need a different procedure for the SRNL center? Why do we need to give the building away to a “quasi governmental” agency?

At this point, it appears the City will give the Aiken Corporation four of the seven properties involved in the massive $9.6 million AMDC purchase: 

  • Warneke Cleaners, McGhee Building (includes old CC Johnson Drug Store), and Taj Restaurant, collectively purchased for $2.25 million. 
  • Holley House, purchased for $2.125 million (half of the $4.25 million Hotel Aiken/Holley House purchase). 

This is money to be given to the Aiken Corporation with zero return to the City essentially a loss of $4.375 million.

This leaves the City still owning:

  • The Hotel Aiken, purchased for $2.125 million. 
  • The Beckman Building at 106 Laurens Street, purchased for $1 million. 
  • Newberry Hall, purchased for $2 million.” 

With this plan, the Aiken Corporation will own the building, charge rent to SRNL, and probably have the City be responsible for maintenance, upkeep, and utilities. Also keep in mind that the City is responsible for the entire cost of the building. If it costs $25 or $30 million, the City would pay everything in excess of $20 million.

SRNL’s decision removes currently taxable property in the middle of our downtown making it no longer taxable. What is the cost of this action over the next 20 years?

I would prefer that a responsible developer determine how much the building would cost before any financial commitment is made by the City. It is shocking that there is no Memorandum of Agreement between SRNL and the City of Aiken outlining SRNL’s requirements which would enable the City to more accurately determine the cost of construction. 

We don’t need the Aiken Corporation involved. It makes no financial sense.

Call the Mayor and your council member to protest this process. Demand more financial data before any commitment is made.

Attend City Council meeting to do the same. 

Dick Dewar
Aiken, SC

________________


Dick Dewar was elected in 2007 to Aiken City Council District 3 and served three terms. He did not seek reelection in 2019.