All posts by Kelly Cornelius

Performance Equine Delivers an Early Christmas Present by Providing Access to Life Saving Colic Surgery in Aiken


Colic. The very word strikes fear into every horse owner. Mild cases can often be managed medically and resolved without ever leaving the farm, but for cases that end up requiring surgery, time is the greatest enemy. Having access to a full-service surgery center nearby is one of the best chances owners can give their horses for a successful outcome. A surgical facility with a full-time equine surgeon capable of performing colic surgery is something that Aiken, despite its high horse population, has been sorely without until recently.

Dr. Sabrina Jacobs, owner and founder of Performance Equine Vets, is responsible for bringing these full-time surgeons to Aiken. Jacobs, who specializes in reproduction, opened Performance in 2004, and it has been expanding ever since. She employs board-certified surgeons, field vets, internal medicine specialists and veterinary assistants. The over 50-acre facility is home to a hospital and surgery center, a reproduction facility with neonatal intensive care and, most recently, a small animal department.

Prior to the recent addition of these full-time surgeons, the options for horses requiring colic surgery in Aiken were few. In the past, Jacobs would fly in a surgeon when available, but colics requiring surgery don’t wait, and the need for a full-time equine surgeon in Aiken was one she worked hard to fill. The only other option was referring and shipping the horses to either Tryon, North Carolina or to the University of Georgia in Athens. The three-hour drive to either facility can spell the difference in the outcome of a colic surgery, so having access to emergency surgery 24/7 in Aiken is a game changer.

The fragile nature of a horse’s digestive system and associated fear of colic shapes most horse owners’ daily choices for feed, hay, turn-out and supplements in constant efforts to prevent it, and “it” comes in many forms including sand, gas, an impaction, a strangulating lipoma and other causes. If the horse does not respond to medical management for colic, then surgery is the only life saving option left.

Two weeks ago my greatest fear was realized, as I arrived for evening chores and found my horse was down, cast on the fence, and thrashing in pain. I phoned a friend to help me extricate him from the fence, and I phoned Performance Equine, who immediately sent a vet on the way. My friend showed up and, on his way, he must have sounded the alarm because, within minutes, a small army of at least ten nearby concerned horse people surrounded us. They stayed to help until the vet arrived, and we waited what seemed like an eternity but was only about 35 minutes. Darkness fell on the pasture, but the collective energy pulling for this horse to survive was palpable, and I will be forever grateful for their support. The sense of community and shared love for our horses confirmed that, despite the battle with Aiken officials to save historic downtown over the last year, I had indeed made the right choice to make Aiken my new home.

The field vet and her assistant arrived, and, initially, my horse responded to treatment, but it didn’t last long. Two hours later he became uncomfortable again so he was transported to Performance for the remainder of the night to be treated there. By early the next morning, he was on the surgery table. Because we shipped him to the clinic when he became uncomfortable, he was already at the facility when the time came to make the decision for surgery. Not having to drive several hours to the nearest University helped give him the best chance of survival.

The continuum of care here is also extremely important, as it was already set up through the field vet that hauling him to the clinic would be the plan, should he become uncomfortable after her visit. There was no time wasted in a referral process. Friends called the clinic when we got him loaded and underway, and internal medicine vet, Dr. Rachelle Thompson, was waiting upon our arrival. She had already been briefed by the field vet, Dr. Hamrick, who initially treated him at the farm. Dr. Thompson oversaw his care throughout the night until the decision was made to take him to surgery when he was not responding to medical management — and while he was still a good candidate for surgery. Surgeon Dr. Stephanie Caston performed the surgery that would save his life. Internal Medicine Specialist Dr. Thompson stayed with him and assisted with the procedure, and then resumed his care upon recovery all the way through to his discharge. The transition from the field visit to hospitalization to surgery, all under one practice, contributed to a successful outcome and cannot be overstated.

A Rare Breed is Becoming Even More Rare

Equine vets, whether they be surgeons, specialists, or field vets have always been a different breed, a special breed. And they need to be. These vets put in long hours, in all weather, and it usually pays quite a bit less than their small animal counterparts can command working a 9-5 job spaying cats. Equine surgeons have always been in limited supply because of the extensive training they require, but today there is actually a documented shortage of all equine vets. A July 2023 article by Justin High, DVM in Quarter Horse News accurately describes the situation saying ” The expectations, standards and history within equine veterinary medicine were built by hard-working, task-oriented perfectionists who laid the ground work where few people these days care to walk.”

In today’s culture filled with millennials who want balance in their life, good old fashioned grit is becoming nearly extinct, and that appears to be one of the main reasons identified for the shortage. The internal medicine vet assigned to my horse (who didn’t even look old enough to be a vet) possessed that grit in spades. She was on call and working every day my horse was hospitalized and throughout the weekend. Dr. Rachelle Thompson is the stuff real equine vets are made of and a rarity of her generation no matter what profession they are in.

Staying IndependentPerformance defies the odds

The clinic is solely owned by Jacobs and in a time when veterinarian-owned facilities are becoming a rarity. Similar to the trend in human medicine, many veterinarian-owned practices are being bought up by much larger corporations. From a horse owner’s prospective, I feel the benefit to patients of having an independently-owned facility is the autonomy of your doctor regarding medical decisions. Corporate-owned facilities can shackle doctors by dictating cost-saving measures handed down by third parties whose job it is to mind the profit margin, and whose decisions might not always constitute the highest standard of care.

Hats off to Dr. Jacobs for bucking the current trend of corporately- owned facilities, for assembling a team of dedicated vets, and for raising the bar in Aiken by providing 24/7 access to life saving emergency surgery. As more horse people continue to find and migrate to Aiken the need for quality care only continues to grow, and Jacobs is answering the call.

Dr. Stephanie Caston (left), Dr. Rachelle Thompson (center), Dr. Sabrina Jacobs (right)

A big thank you to Dr. Sabrina Jacobs, Dr. Rachelle Thompson, Dr. Stephanie Caston, Dr. Brianna Hamrick, and to Technicians Cheyenne, Victoria, Emily and all of the staff at Performance for the best Christmas present ever — my horse’s life.

We were sidelined for this year’s Hoofbeats parade but thanks to Performance we are already looking forward to that stirrup cup in front of the Willcox next year.

Aiken’s Cousin Problem – The Aiken Corporation Targets Newberry Street for SRNL Spec Project

by Kelly Cornelius
October 31, 2023

On September 25, 2023, the not-for-profit Aiken Corporation voted to recommend to the Aiken City Council their own recently purchased property for the site of the $20M Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) “mixed-use office building. The 1.01 acre parcel was acquired in July of 2022 for $650K by its for-profit arm called LED of Aiken. The parcel sits adjacent to Aiken Corp President Buzz Rich’s law office, it sits outside of the defined area of the contracted study and the seller was represented by Aiken City Councilman/real estate broker Ed Girardeau. In a town where recent events have revealed a very blurred line between public service and self-service, the path of how this winning parcel came to be put forth is certainly worth a look.

A Brief History

On Jan 23rd, 2023, four months after Project Pascalis failed, the City of Aiken announced their partnership with SRNL to build a $20M “Workforce Development Center” on three or more of those same ill-begotten Pascalis properties. The properties were still owned at the time, by the Aiken Municipal Development Commission (AMDC), who lacked a quorum. The announcement did not include the fact that the Aiken Corporation had been secretly involved in the project for two months at this point.

On March 13th of 2023, despite the fact that the city still had no signed contract with SRNL, Aiken City Council voted 4-0 to award a no-bid, $250,000 pre-development contract to the Aiken Corporation, which was recently described as a “cousin” of the City by Mayor Rick Osbon. The contract was specific, right down to the tax identification numbers on the properties to be included in the feasibility study, yet the parcel the Aiken Corp ended up recommending to City Council for the $20M “Mixed-Use” project did not even meet this very specific condition of the study – the location.

In addition to straying from the scope of the location, the feasibility study results curiously lacked the actual lab. The “workforce center had somehow morphed into being called a “Mixed-use project” by the overdue and long awaited study reveal. By this time, DOE/SRNL went from promoting it as the “Face of the Lab” in January of 2023 to “an expression of leasing office space should it become available” in July of 2023, in response to a story that Lauren Young of WXFG-FOX News aired featuring citizens questioning the project.

 

The would-be SRNL project still lacks a signed contract showing any commitment from SRNL, making it merely a speculative project at this point. The recent release of the feasibility study conducted by Aiken Corporation’s subcontractor McMillan Pazdan Smith (MPS) was five months past its due date and did not get a warm welcome from the citizenry. Considering the dismal track record of the Aiken Corporation’s other spec building, taxpayers should pay close attention to what their $250K has yielded thus far.  

Specifics on the parcel

The winning Aiken Corporation parcel is actually three smaller parcels that combined occupy a total of 1.01 acres.

One parcel housed a two-story home (shown below) that had already been approved by the Design Review Board in Jan of 2021 to be relocated to another part of Aiken’s Parkway District. According to Design Review Board (DRB) minutes, that move would later be nixed due to the number of trees that would have to be removed to allow for this relocation. The picture below was found in the 2021 agenda packet (1).

Pave Paradise to put up a Parking Lot Mixed-Use Project?

May 3, 2022. Demolition Request

At that meeting, Aiken Corporation President Buzz Rich lobbied the DRB for approval to demolish the Newberry Street structure to make way for a parking lot. He mentioned that Councilman Ed Girardeau—who was the real estate agent representing the seller for the property sale—was in attendance that evening. Mr. Rich also noted the subject property is adjacent to property he owns. Aiken Corp meeting minutes (2) will show that the Aiken Corporation has the property under contract at this time but they would not close on it until July of 2022.

The home on the property was portrayed as unsafe by the applicant and the photos would have made one believe it was an eyesore, which at the time was true.

As it turns out, the building was only in a state of disassembly which was revealed in the meeting agenda packet as it had been donated to Mr. McGhee for relocation on Williamsburg St. The photo of the building sharply contrasts the photo one year prior when the relocation was approved. The move, however, would never happen because of the number of trees that would require removal. Instead, demolition was approved by the DRB at their May 3rd, 2022 meeting.

FOIA Request To the City on 9/26/2023

On September 26th, 2023, a Freedom of Information Act request was submitted for the purchase and sale agreement and settlement statements for this property recommended for a $20 million city project. The City responded on September 28th that:

The City of Aiken has determined that LED of Aiken, Inc. is a separate entity from the City of Aiken and that the City is not in possession of any of the requested documents.

A second FOIA attempt was made on Sept 28th, 2023 this time via the contact form on the Aiken Corporation’s website. Results from that FOIA revealed that ReMax Tattersall, where Ed Girardeau is listed as an owner/broker, received over $42,000 in commission from the sale; and that Security Federal Bank was the lender for the purchase. These are good cousins to have.

June 8, 2022. Aiken Corp Meeting – Financing

The meeting minutes for June 8, 2022, show that Aiken Corporation Executive Committee members Tim Simmons and Joe Lewis were present during a unanimous vote to approve the Security Federal project financing, a $650,000 loan with interest-only payments for six months and minimal closing costs. Mr. Simmons is listed here as Chairman of the Security Federal Board and Mr. Lewis is listed here as Vice President of Financial Services.
_.

Between the July closing and the January 2023 SRNL project announcement, the old home was demolished. No mention was made of the Aiken Corporation during that January announcement, even though the organization was deeply involved at that point.

The involvement of the Aiken Corporation was not revealed until February 6th, and its Newberry Street property was never identified or considered as part of the SRNL project feasibility study until that study was revealed on September 14th, 2023.

Sept 11, 2023. Closed-Door Executive Session

On September 11th, 2023 prior to the regular meeting, City Council held a closed-door Executive Session to discuss two items, one of which was “The proposed purchase, sale and /or leasing of property for the Savannah River National Laboratory.”

The closed-door meeting was attended by five Aiken Corporation Board members and McMillan Pazdan Smith representatives. City Council cited exemption#2 for excluding citizens from what is otherwise allowable at a public meeting: “Section 30-4-70 (a)(2) of the South Carolina Code to discuss negotiations incident to proposed contractual arrangements and proposed sale or purchase of property.” Yet, the Aiken Corporation’s lawyer responsible for helping to negotiate a lease is conspicuously missing from the attendee list.

No summary or announcement of what was discussed was presented to the audience and there was still no signed contract with SRNL announced at the next meeting on Sept 25th, 2023.

Once again, City Council met in secrecy, repeating the same conduct displayed during Project Pascalis.

September 25th, 2023. Aiken Corp Meeting – 10 AM

On September 25, 2023, the Aiken Corporation Executive Committee voted 10-0 to approve the recommendation made by subcontractor MPS to locate what was by then the “Mixed-Use” office building on the Aiken Corporation property

Aiken Corp President Buzz Rich abstained from voting on the recommendation since his law office was adjacent to it, an abstention that contrasts with his negotiations to purchase the building and the signing of the purchase contract. Aiken County property records show Rich owns four commercial properties on that block. (3)

Aiken Corp Board Member Joe Lewis also abstained due to his company holding the Newberry St property mortgage, although according to the minutes he voted to approve the financing in June 2022.

Neither abstainee left the meeting which can be seen here, (see minute 33:40), and Chairman Rich continued to speak during the discussion. The Newberry St property was ultimately voted on to be recommended to City Council for the would-be SRNL spec project. Rich would present the recommendation to Council later that same evening.

Sept 25, 2023. City Council Meeting – 7 pm

Aiken Corp President Buzz Rich presented the Aiken Corp Executive Committee recommendation to the Aiken City Council even though he abstained from the recommendation vote. During his presentation, Rich never mentioned any of the public comments taken since Feb 6th.

Rich did describe to City Council all the extra hours that Aiken Corp members have put in on this project and the fact that they are volunteers. However, their monthly meetings are typically held at 10 am during banking hours, and there were no meetings in the two months preceding the release of the study and the Board’s discussion to vote to locate a $20 Million dollar project on their property.

Location Location Location

How did a site not within the prescribed scope of the study get included in the study? As documented in The Devil is in the Details, four out of the five sites in the bombed feasibility study release were actually outside the contracted scope of the project. In the May 10th, 2023 Aiken Corporation meeting there was an update on the project with no mention on the record about additional sites, however, when the Feasibility Study was finally released, presto change-o we magically had five sites.

Could it be that shoe-horning a 36,000 square foot building, reduced from the original 45,000 square foot building, over top of historic downtown was not only unpopular with taxpayers, it just wasn’t feasible? Somewhere along the way (and outside of the sunshine) they added four additional sites without divulging this to taxpayers until after the fact who are footing the bill for the study. Information obtained through FOIA requests show that $148K has been spent to date of the $250K approved.

One of those four additional sites was the old hospital site, which seemed to many the first sign of common sense displayed regarding this project so even Pascalis weary citizens were hopeful. The nine-plus acre site has plenty of room including parking and nearby lunch options. In addition, it would save a beautiful historic building without changing the very soul of downtown. That common sense option was quickly eliminated by K.J. Jacobs of MPS but not before forgetting to tell the Aiken Corporation Members about it before their big Q and A with citizens. So as stealthy as it was added, it was also eliminated in favor of the just over one acre property on a tree-lined portion of Newberry St.

Ironically, after Mr. McGhee was denied the relocation of the home on the subject property to Williamsburg St because of trees, City Officials had eleven trees destroyed on Williamsburg St in the Parkway including directly in front of the homes that Mr. McGhee had restored.

A FOIA request has been submitted to the Aiken Corp for the Tree Survey on the Newberry St. property referred to by Mr. Rich as “about a 50 page report” regarding the 23 trees on the property at the Oct 11th Aiken Corp meeting, which, thanks to citizen footage, we now know included a Monkey in the Room. (Update: The FOIA request was fulfilled and the tree survey can be found in the DRB’s May 2, 2024 agenda packet; along with the rest of the application for the lab building design).

The Aiken City Council listened to the presentation from the Aiken Corporation on the evening of September 25th, 2023 but to date has not put the item back on the agenda for a public hearing.

Footnotes:

  1. Jan 2021 Design Review Board Agenda Packet https://edoc.cityofaikensc.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=540853&dbid=0&repo=City-of-Aiken-LF
  2. April 14th, 2022 Aiken Corp minutes confirm that Rich signed a contract to purchase the property as the Aiken Corp.

3. Map showing the commercial property Rich owns (in teal) on the same block according to Aiken County records with the subject property outlined in red.

“The Devil is in the Details” – The Aiken Corporation Study Missed the Most Essential Detail of All

The Aiken Corporation Study Missed the Most Essential Detail of All: The Scope of the Study.

Less than two weeks after the long-awaited Feasibility Study was released to the public, the Aiken Corporation voted Monday morning to recommend a Newberry Street site to City Council for a $20 million “mixed-use facility.” This recommendation came almost 8 months to the day after the mayor’s January 2023 announcement that the City of Aiken was partnering with Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) to build  a $20 million “workforce development center” on the property known to most of us as the failed Project Pascalis properties. 

The Aiken Corporation is a not-for-profit entity doing business for the City as part of a “public-private partnership”. There are no elected officials on the Board and, according to their bylaws, membership is chosen by the Board.

In March — two months after the January announcement of the City of Aiken’s partnership with SRNL, and despite the fact that there was no signed contract with SRNL — the Aiken Corporation was awarded a $250K , no-bid contract to do pre-development work for the SRNL project. The contract identified a single downtown site on publicly-owned, Pascalis project properties to be evaluated for both the proposed SRNL facility and retail use. 

  1. The size of the building was reduced from 45,000 sq ft to 36,000 sq ft.
  2. The project morphed from an SRNL workforce development building to a $20 million mixed-use spec building with no committed tenants.
  3. The number of potential sites grew from one to a surprising five options.
“The Unforced Error”

One of the biggest points of discussion preceding the Newberry Street vote in the Monday morning Aiken Corporation meeting regarded the major snafu at the second public input meeting on Thursday night, September 21. At that meeting, a citizen pointed out that the poster board presentation of the old Aiken County Hospital site, (which had been featured in the first meeting on September 14), was missing.

The Aiken Corporation panel was caught completely off-guard and meeting attendees were treated to the Aiken Corp’s version of Whose on First? Neither MPS nor the Aiken Corporation told the public on Thursday that the hospital site had been removed from consideration. In fact, it seemed like the Aiken Corp panelists had no idea the Old Hospital Site had been eliminated somewhere between their first public reveal a week earlier and the Thurs Sept 21st Q and A session.

Architect K.J. Jacobs: “Maybe the mistake was looking at the site at all because it never met the criteria of the study in the first place “

Scope of The Project

Newsflash: With the exception of the “Richland Avenue” site on the Pascalis project properties, not a single alternative site met the criteria of the study.

As reported in Three Missing Pages, the site boundaries and tax parcel numbers were defined in Exhibit A of the March 14th Professional Services Agreement. City Council was told on March 13th that “
The scope of the project is located on a portion of property between Bee Lane, The Alley, Richland Ave West, and Newberry St. Southwest .”
( March 13th City Council Meeting Minutes, Page 16)

So, not only did the Old Hospital Site not meet the location criteria as defined by the city, none of the other sites, which had somehow been added to the study without the public’s knowledge, met the location criteria.

The Details

When it came time to vote on the Newberry Street site recommendation during the Monday morning Aiken Corporation meeting, two of the members abstained from voting but stayed in the discussion. If Aiken officials learned one thing from failed Project Pascalis it should have been how to properly recuse from meetings when potential conflicts of interest are at play.

Ironically, that evening, during the regular Monday night City Council meeting, Aiken Corporation’s Vice-Chairman, Pat Cunning, went on to tell Council, while extolling their success with public-private partnerships such as this, “The devil is in the details. We just watch the money.”

FOOTNOTES

The $250k, no-bid contract received by the Aiken Corporation to do pre-development work came with a defined territory of study as listed in the March 13th, 2023 City Council minutes and the March 14th, 2023 Professional Agreement signed by the City.

A December 9, 2022 contract between the Aiken Corporation and McMillan Pazdan Smith was also referred to in a March 14 Professional Agreement and a Nov 30th letter which was signed Buzz Rich on Dec 9th also references the location

30 November 2022
ATTN: Mr. Tim O’ Briant
Chairman Arthur W. ” Buzz” Rich
Aiken Corporation
111 Chesterfield Street
Aiken, SC 29801
RE: Goal Setting Programming for New Office Building + Meeting Venue
City of Aiken, South Carolina
Dear Tim:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal related to your proposed new, mixed- use building in downtown Aiken. We understand that the proposed site is an +/- 0. 55- acre, T- shaped parcel bounded by Richland Avenue NW, Newberry Street NW and Bee Lane. The project, which will be constructed and owned by the Aiken Corporation, is conceptualized as a mixed- use building containing approximately 30, 000 square feet of office space and a 10, 000- 15, 000 square foot exhibition hall with associated meeting and support spaces. The site is currently occupied by a variety of existing buildings, some of which may be of cultural of historical significance.

Editorial: Project Pascalis 2.0 – The Bomb Plant Lab Reveal …Bombs

By Kelly Cornelius
September 19, 2023

Last Thursday, and five months behind schedule, the Aiken Corporation finally released the results of a feasibility study which was funded by a $250K no-bid contract awarded by the City of Aiken to the Aiken Corporation.

This need to do a feasibility study arose in January 2023 after the announcement of the partnership of the City of Aiken with Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) to put a workforce development center on many of the failed Project Pascalis properties.

The long-awaited big reveal in this dog and pony show sadly lacked the dogs, the ponies, and even the actual lab. Six months after dedicating a quarter-million dollars to the Aiken Corporation’s pre-development contract all there is to show for it so far is a study that lacked pertinent data, lacked any mention of SRNL, and only led to further questions about the project, not the least of which were, “What is the Aiken Corporation?” and “What exactly do they do?” 

In the simplest terms, the Aiken Corporation is the development arm of the City of Aiken, a 501(c)3 organization “organized in 1995 exclusively for charitable purposes.” There are currently no elected officials on the Aiken Corporation’s board, giving this group of unappointed, private-sector individuals immense power over taxpayer-funded assets. 

From Pascalis 1.0 to Pascalis 2.0: A Brief History on the Would-Be SRNL Office Project

Details of Project Pascalis were rolled out to the public in March 2022, and by May had triggered lawsuits, ethics complaints, a citizens’ petition campaign, and a Pigs of Pigscalis gallery of political cartoons — all in an effort to stop this project which had already squandered $9.6 million taxpayer dollars and planned to demolish half a downtown block. The wildly unpopular Project Pascalis, whose time of death was officially called in September 2022, seemed to gain zombie powers as it was quickly but secretly resurrected into Pascalis 2.0 in the form of a poorly defined office complex for Savannah River National Laboratory.

Pascalis 1.0 also likely contributed to the August 2023 ousting of the incumbent Mayor Rick Osbon who had vigorously supported the project. Pascalis 1.0 was the brainchild of the Aiken Municipal Development Corporation (AMDC), which eventually suffered a similar fate as Project Pascalis, being officially dissolved in May of this year but not before Public Trust was destroyed.

After the seeming death/cancellation of Pascalis in late September 2022, the citizens of Aiken breathed a collective sigh of relief. Little did they know, but Aiken City officials had wasted no time in attending secret meetings and plotting the Pascalis 2.0 — the Bomb Plant Lab offices — on many of the same $9.6 million worth of taxpayer-owned Pascalis properties. As happened with Pascalis 1.0, there were no public meetings, just more secrecy in advance of the eventual rollout to the public. 

The Big Rollout

The big announcement was made on January 23, 2023 in the Mayor’s State of the City address. From the “zero lessons learned department,” the City announced its partnership with SRNL (Savannah River Nuclear Laboratory) to build the lab on many of the now failed Project Pascalis properties— despite the fact the properties were still owned by an embattled AMDC that lacked even a quorum to vote. Citizens would later learn that the Aiken Corporation had secretly contracted McMillan, Pazdan, Smith for this project way back in Dec of 2022, again, despite the fact that the properties were AMDC-owned at the time.

On February 6, 2023 citizens were invited to a “listening session” wherein they were introduced to KJ Jacobs from McMillan, Pazdan Smith, who announced the intention, complete with an April deadline, to do a feasibility study on the SRNL project.

On March 13th the City Council, ok, four members of the city council because three of them recused, voted to approve the 250K contract with the Aiken Corp for this work. According to the minutes

The Study’s Big Reveal

Six months into the $250k contract, one might have expected details, preliminary renderings, and answers to questions. Instead, we received 21 pages of vague assessments, lack of detail and generic blue boxes or massings for buildings. The report is actually only 14 pages of information as 7 of those pages were cover sheets.

To those of us concerned with a government takeover of the downtown, the attention to detail was underwhelming. Citizens who attended the meeting reported that no actual questions were answered. The long-awaited and long overdue results of that taxpayer-funded study came to a reveal that, well, bombed. It seems that the Aiken Corporation didn’t even bother to put lipstick on this nuclear pig.

The existing view of the proposed SRNL building, as seen from the porch of Casa Bella Italian Restaurant on Chesterfield Street. (Photo courtesy of Lee Doran Thornton).

The view of this same Chesterfield Street site as it would appear with the proposed, three-story, 36,000 sq. ft. building.

What Now?

It seems as if this bad idea went from being named Project Pascalis pushed by the AMDC to the SRNL project being pushed by the Aiken Corporation. The organizational names have changed, but the lack of transparency, the thoughtless spending, and the lack of accountability remain the same.

There are currently no elected officials on the Aiken’s Corporation board, giving this group of unappointed private-sector individuals immense power over taxpayer-funded assets. The track record with the Railroad Depot project and the Amentum building — both of which were plagued with expensive cost overruns and lack of communication and accountability — has never really been addressed, nor the questions answered.

Today, the questions continue. For instance, is SRNL even a consideration at this point? This controversial project, initially billed as “the community face of the laboratory,” was met with significant disapproval from the community after its January 23 announcement. By July — as evidenced by SRNL’s statement, triggered by this Fox 54 interview — SRNL showed a certain distance and lack of commitment to the process.

Is SRNL still a factor in this project?

Also, how does the non-profit Aiken Corporation manage the large rent it hauls from its prized Amentum building? Too, we have to ask, was the DRB asleep at the wheel when they approved that building? Is the Aiken Corporation able to do business in light of it’s recent violation for failing to file a key financial report?

In the bigger picture, why can’t a city of roughly 32,000 residents be managed efficiently by elected officials rather than cooked-up entities like the now-defunct Aiken Municipal Development Corporation (AMDC) or the Aiken Corporation? My attendance at an Aiken Corporation meeting and my ongoing research leave me feeling that this is a form of shadow government. There is zero accountability to taxpayers and no avenue for public comment at their meetings.

For a City that can’t even manage to provide clean water to its residents, this latest twist in the Pascalis plot that is being pushed from a lame-duck agenda can only promise, if approved, to drain and squander yet more millions from the taxpayers’ pockets.  As revealed in the article, Project Labscalis Annual Operating Costs, the funding of the lab doesn’t stop at the $9.6 million overpayment for the properties, nor the $250K cost for for a bombed feasibility study. There would be a yearly baked-in subsidy that city residents would have to swallow, even as the water out of their faucets isn’t fit to sip.

A Clinic in Civility – Aiken’s Mayor, Rick Osbon

Aiken’s City Council often asks for civility from the public during meetings yet they don’t always lead by example, as evidenced by the March 27, 2023 video, below, where Mayor Osbon cuts off a citizen at three minutes but kindly grants extra time to a developer.

Nearly a year earlier this was the scene at the May 9, 2022 second reading of an ordinance that would give away an integral portion of Newberry Street to the City Attorney’s law partner, Ray Massey, who was the listed agent for RPM Development Partners, the “developer of choice” for the controversial, now-failed Project Pascalis.

As reported in The Pascalis Attorneys:

Conflict-of-interest issues were raised at least five times that evening. The earliest exchange, between Mayor Osbon and Aiken City landowner Drew Johnson, had passages not recorded in the official meeting minutes. Read part of this transcript, below.

Johnson: You can’t have a city attorney give millions of dollars to his—

Mayor Osbon, interrupting: The city attorney doesn’t vote to give any money.

Johnson replied: Well you and you guys all knew about that. Y ’all had to have known that they were business partners, which makes you guys look really bad. This is crazy.” 

Mayor Osbon, interrupting: You can’t stand and libel the City Attorney.”

Johnson replied, referring to Gary Smith’s presence at the March 28, 2022 meeting: I mean, I’m just telling the facts he was at the meeting.

At no time did Mayor Osbon acknowledge State law and City policies guiding potential conflicts of interest, nor did he acknowledge that, while the City Attorney does not vote, he does prepare the ordinances that are up for a vote and provides legal counsel during the debate, which the City Attorney did on March 28.

The public would not be made aware until the August 2022 release of the article, The Pascalis Attorneys, that Drew Johnson’s concerns over this conflict of interest were not only well-justified, but were already known among Aiken officials. These same conflicts of interests would soon become the subjects of three lawsuits that contributed to the demise of Project Pascalis.